<div class="raw-html-embed"><a href="https://staempflirecht.ch/studium">JUS-Studium? Das Fachwissen von Expertinnen und Experten des Schweizer Rechts – griffbereit!</a></div>

Über uns

À propos de nous

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Karriere

Carrière

Aboverträge Kündigen

Résiliation d’abonnement

Vertrag widerrufen

Résiliation de contrat 

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Impressum

Mentions légales

Barrierefreiheit

Accessibilité

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

Libra

Was ist Libra?

C'est quoi Libra ?

Kostenlos testen

Tester gratuitement

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Aktienrecht

Droit des sociétés anonymes

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Digitales Angebot

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Swisslex

Dienstleistungen

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Open Access Policy

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Partner

Partenaires

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Sortiment & Suche

Catalogue & Recherche

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Gesamtkatalog

Catalogue complet

Fachkatalog Recht

Catalogue de droit

Aus der Reihe: e-fellows.net stipendiaten-wissen

Isabelle Bayreuther

Originalism and Judicial Discretion. A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Interpretation in the United States

Der Präventivgewahrsam in Bayern. Rechtliche Grundlagen, Voraussetzungen und Kritik an der Verhältnismäßigkeit

Janny Hochheim

Rechtliche Voraussetzungen und mögliche Auswirkungen eines Parteiverbots

Parteiverbotsverfahren gegen die AfD

This socio-legal text examines the role of judges as agents of social change and the societal impact of their decisions. Drawing on first-hand experiences, informant narratives, and historical insights, it explores the Nigerian judiciary, judicial discretion, precedent, and courts' societal role. The book argues that judges should interpret justice with social interests, social and judicial empathy, and evolving contexts in mind, rather than strictly adhering to precedent. With a pragmatic approach and clear diagrams, it challenges judicial stereotypes and emphasizes the need for 'appropriate' discretion that aligns with the public understanding of justice. This book highlights the courts' critical role in shaping societal development by addressing the interplay between law and society. Its interdisciplinary and humanitarian approach offers fresh perspectives on how judicial decision-making affects the public and sparks a long-overdue debate on interpreting justice in a changing world.

"With her unique Socio-Judicial Approach, the author boldly reimagines judging as a democratic and socially engaged process. A thought-provoking work of wide relevance."
 - Hon. Chief Judge Kashim Zannah (President, Commonwealth Judicial Education Institute (CJEI), Chief Judge, Borno State, Nigeria)
"This book recalls Cardozo's "The Nature of the Judicial Process"-a powerful compliment. A profound and timely contribution to understanding judging in today's world."
 - Dr. Malcolm M. Feeley (Professor Emeritus, UC Berkeley School of Law)
"A masterful exploration of discretion and interpretation, reinforcing the idea of courts as agents of social change. A valuable resource for judges and scholars."
<blockquote>
- Hon. Justice Amina Adamu Augie, Rtd. JSC (Justice, The Supreme Court of Nigeria)
</blockquote>

A Matter of Interpretation and Judicial Discretion

The Act of Judging in Nigeria

With Congress paralyzed, lawmaking falls to executive agencies and courts that interpret existing statutes. Due to the so-called Chevron doctrine, courts generally defer to agencies. Thomas Merrill examines the immense consequences of the doctrine and the intense backlash, offering a new way to conceptualize the authority of agencies and courts.

With Congress paralyzed, lawmaking falls to executive agencies and courts that interpret existing statutes. Due to the so-called Chevron doctrine, courts generally defer to agencies. Thomas Merrill examines the immense consequences of the doctrine and the intense backlash, offering a new way to conceptualize the authority of agencies and courts.

Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State

The Chevron Doctrine

"Revenge for the Sixties by Peter S. Canellos takes a studiously independent tone towards his subject." - Financial TimesThe first-ever biography of the most pivotal Justice on the Supreme Court whose decisions, like the overturning of Roe, will drive the reshaping of America, by prize-winning journalist Peter Canellos. When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson, the landmark case overturning Roe v. Wade, it marked a turning point in the lives of millions of Americans. It was also the culmination of a decades-long movement whose grievances were embodied by the man who wrote the court's opinion: Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. Steely in his demeanor, with an impassive appearance that defies changing fashions, Alito could be the family lawyer in a 1960s television drama. But when he talks there is an emotional undercurrent, a fast-flowing stream beneath a placid surface. This is a man driven to push boundaries and mold ideas. His aim is to right the wrongs of the past six decades, as he saw them. He was the prized son of an Italian-born father and a mother whose parents emigrated from Italy shortly before her birth, worked their way into the middle class despite anti-Catholic prejudice and humiliating setbacks like evictions, and exacting big achievement demands of their children. But his family's values came under attack during the sixties and later when Alito was at Princeton as the Vietnam war raged, women demanded equality, and their brand of patriotism was devalued. The Federalist Society provided a safe space for Alito and those like him, and he moved fast up the judicial ladder to eventually land on the Supreme Court. There he has been aggressive in pushing the law in new, conservative directions-from pushing for expanding rights for the religious conservatives, overturning affirmative action, extending the right to bear arms to thwart gun controls, and reducing the power of the Environmental Protection Agency. And finally-most crucial to his legacy-he was the author of Dobbs v. Jackson, bringing the conservative legal movement full circle in overruling Roe v. Wade. His ethnic and religious background, his intellectual confidence, and his unyielding determination are all illustrative of a group of men and women who, beset by grievance, embarked on a decades-long mission to change the rules that govern society.

Sam Alito and the Triumph of the Conservative Legal Movement

Revenge for the Sixties

Examensarbeit aus dem Jahr 2024 im Fachbereich Jura - Öffentliches Recht / Staatsrecht / Grundrechte, Ruhr-Universität Bochum (Juristische Fakultät), Veranstaltung: Europäisches Wirtschaftsrecht, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: In dieser umfassenden Seminararbeit wird die Klimaschutzkonzeption des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte (EGMR) und des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (BVerfG) eingehend analysiert. Die Arbeit beleuchtet die rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen und die Entwicklung der relevanten Rechtsprechung, die den Schutz der Menschenrechte im Kontext des Klimawandels behandelt.

Durch eine vergleichende Analyse der Ansätze beider Gerichte werden Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede herausgearbeitet, um die Wirksamkeit ihrer Entscheidungen in der Klimapolitik zu bewerten. Herausforderungen und rechtliche Grenzen werden ebenfalls thematisiert, wobei der Fokus auf den politischen Implikationen der Urteile liegt. Diese Seminararbeit bietet eine tiefgehende Analyse der Klimaschutzkonzeption des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte (EGMR) und des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (BVerfG) mit einem besonderen Fokus auf das Recht auf chancengerechte Freiheitsverteilung. Sie untersucht die wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen, die diese Konzepte untermauern, sowie die Gewaltenteilung zwischen dem Bundestag und dem BVerfG in Bezug auf die Klimapolitik.

Die Arbeit beleuchtet die Versubjektivierung von Artikel 20a GG und diskutiert die Schaffung eines neuen Grundrechts im Grundgesetz, das dem Klimaschutz eine verfassungsrechtliche Basis verleiht. Zudem wird die Debatte über die Aufnahme des Pariser Abkommens im Grundgesetz thematisiert und dessen potenzielle Auswirkungen auf die deutsche Klimapolitik.

Diese Seminararbeit bietet eine fundierte Grundlage für alle, die sich mit der Schnittstelle von Recht, Klimaschutz und Menschenrechten auseinandersetzen möchten. Sie eignet sich ideal für Studierende der Rechtswissenschaften, Umweltpolitik und verwandter Fachrichtungen. Nutzen Sie die Gelegenheit, in ein aktuelles und relevantes Thema einzutauchen und Ihre Kenntnisse zu erweitern!

Henry Stock-Schröer

Zur grundrechtsdogmatischen "Klimaschutz-Konzeption" von Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte und Bundesverfassungsgericht

 Anonymous

Geschlechtergerechte Sprache in der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Verfassungsrechtliche Gebotenheit und praktische Grenzen

This book examines the history, theories and legal principles underpinning the rules and practice of civil litigation in England and Wales. English civil procedure has been the object of renewed interest in the last 20 years since Lord Woolf proposed and implemented reforms of the civil justice system on a scale unequalled since the mid-19th century. Focusing on the overarching theoretical framework of civil procedure, this book provides a rigorous contextual analysis of the rules and practice of civil litigation in England and Wales and identifies the applicable rule of process and its rationale and connection to these rules and determines the scope of judicial discretion and regulatory flexibility. Chapter 1 sets out the core themes of the work, Chapter 2 provides the important historical background to modern English rules of court. Chapter 3 focuses on the rules of court as addressed to and concerning the litigant. This chapter therefore presents the 'fundamental principles' as the 'promises' by the state to litigants, that their rights will be enforced. It addresses the nature of a civil lawsuit and of the right to sue itself, whether private, that is, part of the litigant's "estate" either directly or as an extension of his other property at stake, or public, as the forum for the determination of the substantive law albeit in an individualized context. This also includes a discussion of the need for - or existence of, in all but name - separation between civil and administrative adjudication. Chapter 4 identifies the current theories of justice determining the function of the civil court in English law and their application to discrete moments of litigation but from the perspective of the way in which the judges conducting the litigation have their role and power reflected and amplified in the rules. Chapters 5 and 6 addresses the nature of the result of litigation, primarily the judgment (but also other types of final adjudicative decisions) and its characters, and the possibilities and nature of appeals in the current system. Chapter 7 considers the result of litigation in the notoriously difficult and uneven area of enforcement of final judgments.

Public and Private Functions of the English Court

Civil Procedure

New York Times Editor's Choice"Biskupic, an accomplished and well-sourced journalist, knows the court as well as anyone now covering it... In her new book Biskupic has done something different and a good deal harder. She has written a group narrative that combines close accounts of the court's public business in the Trump years with a history of its private dramas and conflicts... The deeper message of 'Nine Black Robes' is that even with a new president in office we remain captive to the Age of Trump... A quiet urgency ripples through this informative, briskly paced and gracefully written book." —New York Times Book Review "Biskupic opens a window onto the opaque, insular world of the justices to show an institution sinking gradually into crisis . . . Biskupic is a longtime chronicler of the court, and "Nine Black Robes" puts on display her connections within its chambers." —Washington Post"[Biskupic] knows how to make news and illuminate the personalities atop the judicial org chart . . . The book reveals unseen sausage-making . . ." —Wall Street Journal"Fascinating and informative . . . [Biskupic's] long experience covering the court . . . has put her in an incomparable position to comment on its make-up, historical positions and direction. It has also made her privy to many significant, little-known secrets about Supreme Court personalities and their historical behaviors." —The National Book ReviewCNN Senior Supreme Court Analyst Joan Biskupic provides an urgent and inside look at the history-making era in the Supreme Court during the Trump and post-Trump years, from its seismic shift to the Right to its controversial decisions, including its reversal of Roe v. Wade, based on access to all the key players.Nine Black Robes displays the inner maneuverings among the Supreme Court justices that led to the seismic reversal of Roe v. Wade and a half century of women’s abortion rights. Biskupic details how rights are stripped away or, alternatively as in the case of gun owners, how rights are expanded. Today’s bench—with its conservative majority—is desperately ideological. The Court has been headed rightward and ensnared by its own intrigues for years, but the Trump appointments hastened the modern transformation. With unparalleled access to key players, Biskupic shows the tactics of each justice and reveals switched votes and internal pacts that typically never make the light of day, yet will have repercussions for generations to come.Nine Black Robes is the definitive narrative of the country’s highest court and its profound impact on all Americans.

New York Times Editor’s Choice"Biskupic, an accomplished and well-sourced journalist, knows the court as well as anyone now covering it... In her new book Biskupic has done something different and a good deal harder. She has written a group narrative that combines close accounts of the court's public business in the Trump years with a history of its private dramas and conflicts... The deeper message of 'Nine Black Robes' is that even with a new president in office we remain captive to the Age of Trump... A quiet urgency ripples through this informative, briskly paced and gracefully written book." —New York Times Book Review "Biskupic opens a window onto the opaque, insular world of the justices to show an institution sinking gradually into crisis . . . Biskupic is a longtime chronicler of the court, and "Nine Black Robes" puts on display her connections within its chambers." —Washington Post"[Biskupic] knows how to make news and illuminate the personalities atop the judicial org chart . . . The book reveals unseen sausage-making . . ." —Wall Street Journal"Fascinating and informative . . . [Biskupic's] long experience covering the court . . . has put her in an incomparable position to comment on its make-up, historical positions and direction. It has also made her privy to many significant, little-known secrets about Supreme Court personalities and their historical behaviors." —The National Book ReviewCNN Senior Supreme Court Analyst Joan Biskupic provides an urgent and inside look at the history-making era in the Supreme Court during the Trump and post-Trump years, from its seismic shift to the Right and battles over constitutional law to its controversial decisions, including its reversal of Roe v. Wade, based on access to all the key players.Nine Black Robes displays the inner maneuverings among the Supreme Court justices that led to the seismic reversal of Roe v. Wade and a half century of women’s abortion rights. Biskupic details how rights are stripped away or, alternatively as in the case of gun owners, how rights are expanded. This gripping work of American political history reveals a bench—with its conservative supermajority—that is desperately ideological. The Court has been headed rightward and ensnared by its own intrigues for years, but the Trump appointments hastened the modern transformation. With unparalleled access to key players, Biskupic shows the tactics of each justice and reveals switched votes and internal pacts that typically never make the light of day, yet will have repercussions for generations to come.Nine Black Robes is the definitive narrative of the country’s highest court and its profound impact on all Americans.This definitive account of the Trump-era court reveals:<ul><li>A Court Transformed: How the three Trump appointments—Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—cemented a new conservative bloc, pushing the Court further and faster to the right than ever before.</li><li>The End of Roe v. Wade: Go behind the scenes of the secret deliberations, switched votes, and internal pacts that led to the seismic reversal of a half-century of abortion rights.</li><li>John Roberts in the Middle: An intimate look at the Chief Justice’s struggle to lead an increasingly ideological bench, his shifting alliances, and his loss of control over a court in overdrive.</li><li>An Inside Look at the Justices: Based on unparalleled access to the key players, this book reveals the tactics, ambitions, and conflicts that define the most secretive and powerful institution in America.</li></ul>

Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences

Nine Black Robes

A deep, intimate, and revelatory portrait of RBG from her two authorized biographers who had unprecedented access to the Justice and her papers. Long before she was “The Notorious RBG,” before she was Justice Ginsburg or Judge Ginsburg or Professor Ginsburg, before she was even Ruth, she was Kiki —a nickname bestowed on the squirmy newborn by her big sister. Kiki grew up to be a feminist icon. After she died, she was criticized for not giving a Democratic President the chance to name her successor. What happened in between often gets lost – until now. In Undaunted Justice, Hartnett and Williams offer a full picture of the woman and the jurist, and why those two parts of her were so deeply intertwined. The book contains new revelations about Ginsburg’s life and legacy, her behind the scenes role in several landmark cases, and her relationships with her colleagues on the Court. She was exacting and demanding. Imbued with an innate sense of fairness and a deep personal gift for making alliances when possible. A compartmentalizer at heart with a strong desire to “not look back,” which made possible her legendary productivity but could sometimes hinder her capacity for critical self-reflection. Reserved and socially awkward to some who didn’t know her well, but fiercely loyal and empathetic to clients, colleagues, friends and family. A surprising adventure seeker, even white-water rafting and parasailing, and horseback-riding into her eighties. But ultimately, this biography – more than 20 years in the making and based on exclusive interviews with the Justice, her family, colleagues and friends from all stages of her life, her private papers and even her honeymoon diary -- shows what it took for a woman of her generation not only to conquer the sexist world of the law, but to leave an indelible mark that would better the lives of women–and men–after her.

The Full Life of Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Justice Undaunted

Masterarbeit aus dem Jahr 2023 im Fachbereich Jura - Öffentliches Recht / Staatsrecht / Grundrechte, Note: 1,3, FernUniversität Hagen (Rechtswissenschaftliche Fakultät - Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht,  juristische Rhetorik und Rechtsphilosophie), Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: In der modernen Gesellschaft sind Konflikte allgegenwärtig, sei es auf individueller, zwischenmenschlicher Ebene oder sogar auf institutioneller und behördlicher Ebene. Um diesen Konflikten auf eine konstruktive und außergerichtliche Weise zu begegnen, hat sich die Mediation als ein bewährtes Verfahren etabliert. Ihre Wirksamkeit beruht nicht nur auf einer langen Tradition, sondern auch auf dem Prinzip der Vertraulichkeit, das ihr zugrunde liegt.Die Vertraulichkeit ist ein wesentliches Merkmal der Mediation, das den Beteiligten ein geschütztes Umfeld bietet, um offen über ihre Anliegen zu sprechen und gemeinsam nach Lösungen zu suchen. Doch diese Vertraulichkeit steht oft im Spannungsfeld mit dem berechtigten Interesse der Öffentlichkeit, insbesondere der Presse, an Informationen über staatliches Handeln und Konfliktlösungsverfahren.Die vorliegende Arbeit setzt sich mit diesem Spannungsverhältnis auseinander und untersucht die Fragestellungen: Inwieweit können sich aus der Vertraulichkeit der Mediation Grenzen für den presserechtlichen Auskunftsanspruch ergeben? Welche Auswirkungen ergeben sich daraus für die Durchführung von Mediationsverfahren mit Beteiligung von Behörden oder anderen staatlichen Stellen?Um diesen Fragen gerecht zu werden, wird zunächst das Prinzip der Vertraulichkeit in der Mediation näher betrachtet, einschließlich seiner Bedeutung im Kontext anderer wesentlicher Prinzipien dieses Verfahrens. Anschließend erfolgt eine Darstellung des presserechtlichen Auskunftsanspruchs, wobei Umfang und Grenzen dieses Anspruchs im Fokus stehen.Darauf aufbauend wird untersucht, wie sich die Vertraulichkeit der Mediation auf den Auskunftsanspruch der Presse auswirkt und welche Konsequenzen sich daraus für die Praxis ergeben. Dabei werden mögliche Lösungsansätze für den Umgang mit dieser Thematik diskutiert.Es ist zu beachten, dass diese Arbeit sich auf Bundes- und Landesrecht beschränkt und ausschließlich den Auskunftsanspruch der Presse betrachtet. Andere Medien und Auskunftsansprüche bleiben außerhalb des Untersuchungsgegenstandes.

Christian Weber

Balance zwischen Vertraulichkeit und Öffentlichkeit. Auswirkungen des presserechtlichen Auskunftsanspruchs auf die Vertraulichkeit der Mediation

Should German property law be adapted to the changed economic realities and in the future cover not only tangible but also intangible objects? Jan Felix Hoffmann examines this question by taking into account French, Austrian and Belgian property law. The latest discussions on crypto assets are also factored into the analysis.

Sachbegriff und Eigentumsordnung

Originalism and Judicial Discretion. A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Interpretation in the United States

Weitere Titel zum Thema