<div class="raw-html-embed"><a href="https://libratech.ai/ch/?utm_source=partner&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_campaign=wkch_libra_prsp_staempfli_07_2026
">Stämpfli Fachinhalte - jetzt im rechtssicheren Libra All-In-One AI Workspace verfügbar - Jetzt kostenlos testen!</a></div>

Über uns

À propos de nous

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Karriere

Carrière

Aboverträge Kündigen

Résiliation d’abonnement

Vertrag widerrufen

Résiliation de contrat 

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Impressum

Mentions légales

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

Libra

Was ist Libra?

C'est quoi Libra ?

Kostenlos testen

Tester gratuitement

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Aktienrecht

Droit des sociétés anonymes

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Digitales Angebot

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Dienstleistungen

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Autorenstimmen

Témoignages

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Partner

Partenaires

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Unsere Funktionen

Nos fonctions

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Gesamtkatalog

Catalogue complet

Dunkley J: Know Your Rights

Know Your Rights

Always plead the 5th but you must say it. Because justice is blind

"We all feel unfairness deeply when treated in rash ways. We expect and the law requires that government officials take fairness seriously, giving notice and an opportunity to be heard before taking our rights away. That is why the U.S. Constitution commands, twice, that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Yet in overheated debates, people argue that others do not deserve any presumption of innocence. In courtrooms and colleges, police stations and jails, restaurants and libraries, print and online, the democratic value of due process is up for grabs"--

Why Fairness Matters in a Polarized World

Defending Due Process

Political Science and International Studies (R0)

Georgios I. Zekos

Governance, Digital Economy and Society

Political, Economic and Legal Effects of Artificial Intelligence

Document from the year 2017 in the subject Law - Civil / Private / Trade / Anti Trust Law / Business Law, , language: English, abstract: The Arbitration Law of India (which possesss huge potential to become a global hub for Arbitration) has undergone a change after the recent Amendments of 2015. This book contains an analysis of Indian law of Arbitration, id est The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 alongwith recent amendments of 2015.The book contains section by section in-depth analysis with help of recent relevant judicial pronouncements. The book also contains a separate chapter on recent landmark judicial pronouncements by Indian Courts which has led to improving image of India from anti Arbitration to Pro-Arbitration state.

Vikrant Yadav

The 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act with Amendments of 2015

Discover the Power of Your Rights: A Journey Through the U.S. Constitution

Imagine unlocking the secrets of the U.S. Constitution, a document that has shaped the very fabric of American freedom and governance. "Your Gov't Your Rights; Simplifying the U S Constitution" offers you a unique opportunity to embark on a journey that not only demystifies this foundational document but also empowers you to embrace your rights and responsibilities as a citizen.

Through an engaging exploration from the historical context to the modern day relevance of each amendment, this book serves as a comprehensive guide to understanding how the U.S. Constitution continues to impact our lives. Why Understanding Your Rights Matters isn't just a chapter; it's a call to action-a reminder that your voice, grounded in the knowledge of your rights, holds incredible power.

Dive deep into the Bill of Rights in Chapter 2, where the freedoms of speech, worship, and privacy come alive through clear explanations and contemporary examples. Understand the critical balance between safety and liberty as you explore the heated debates surrounding the Second Amendment. Furthermore, Chapter 4: Understanding the Amendments Through Modern Issues, illuminates how today's digital age and societal shifts challenge and redefine our freedoms.

But it doesn't stop at understanding. How to Exercise Your Rights in Chapter 5 transforms knowledge into action, guiding you through engaging in civic duties, protecting your rights, and influencing governance at local levels. You're not just learning about the Constitution-you're preparing to be a proactive participant in the ongoing story of American democracy.

The final chapters, including The Role of the Supreme Court in Interpreting the Constitution and Future Amendments: What's Next?, offer a forward-looking perspective on how our understanding of this living document continues to evolve. Plus, with a dedicated section answering your most pressing questions and real-life case studies, you'll see the Constitution in action, making its importance in daily life undeniably clear.

With this book as your guide, the Constitution is no longer a distant document of the past, but a vibrant, living framework that empowers you, protects you, and invites you to shape the future. Embrace your role in this living constitution and discover the power of your rights today.

Your Gov't Your Rights; Simplifying the U S Constitution

This collective work provides a chronological and up-to-date reconstruction of the three-round debate between Robert Alexy and Ralf Poscher. The debate represents the German development of an enduring jurisprudential controversy over the concept and adjudicatory role of legal principles, classically addressed by HLA Hart and Ronald Dworkin. Alexy's principles theory, which has initially defined 'legal principles' as optimisation requirements, currently argues that they express an 'ideal ought'. Poscher's critique challenges the soundness of Alexy's principles theory by questioning its ontological and epistemological commitments. As legal principles are directly related to constitutional rights, the Alexy-Poscher debate has significant implications for constitutional adjudication. For instance, proportionality analysis - which incorporates a highly controversial balancing test - and the legitimate boundaries of judicial power, hinge on the debate's two opposing views. Yet despite the centrality and pervasiveness of this topic, German contributions to the theoretical and practical impact of legal principles remain generally overlooked by English-speaking scholars. Concluding with David Duarte's critical and meticulous assessment of the debate, this collection bridges that important scholarly gap. Whether or not conversant in the debate on legal principles, legal researchers and advanced law students with interdisciplinary interests in jurisprudence and constitutional law will find in this book a timely and distinctive introduction to leading developments in German legal thinking.

This collective work provides a chronological and up-to-date reconstruction of the three-round debate between Robert Alexy and Ralf Poscher. The debate represents the German development of an enduring jurisprudential controversy over the concept and adjudicatory role of legal principles, classically addressed by HLA Hart and Ronald Dworkin. Alexy’s principles theory, which has initially defined ‘legal principles’ as optimisation requirements, currently argues that they express an ‘ideal ought’. Poscher’s critique challenges the soundness of Alexy’s principles theory by questioning its ontological and epistemological commitments. As legal principles are directly related to constitutional rights, the Alexy-Poscher debate has significant implications for constitutional adjudication. For instance, canons of constitutional interpretation and construction—especially proportionality and balancing tests—and the limits to judicial powers hinge on these two opposing views. Yet despite the centrality and pervasiveness of this topic, German contributions to the theoretical and practical impact of legal principles remain generally overlooked by English-speaking scholars. Concluded with David Duarte’s critical and meticulous assessment of the debate, this collection bridges that important scholarly gap. Whether or not conversant in the debate on legal principles, legal researchers and advanced law students with interdisciplinary interests in jurisprudence and constitutional law will find in this book a timely and distinctive introduction to leading developments in German legal thinking.

The Alexy-Poscher Debate on Legal Principles

Masterarbeit aus dem Jahr 2024 im Fachbereich BWL - Rechnungswesen, Bilanzierung, Steuern, Note: 1,0, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg (Externes Rechnungswesen und Wirtschaftsprüfung), Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Die vorliegende Masterarbeit setzt sich mit aktuellen Fragestellungen der Bilanzierung von Reverse-Factoring-Transaktionen und damit verbundenen Problembereichen auseinander. Diese sind vor allen Dingen in der ausweisbezogenen Klassifizierung einer Verbindlichkeit und in der Darstellung innerhalb der Kapitalflussrechnung zu sehen. In diesem Zusammenhang werden aktuelle Fragestellungen analysiert und gewürdigt. 

Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, die Bilanzierung von RF-Transaktionen nach IFRS unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des rechtlichen Rahmens entsprechender Vereinbarungen zu erläutern und insbesondere die aktuellen Änderungen an IFRS 7 und IAS 7 durch das IASB vor dem Hintergrund der Zielsetzung der Vermittlung entscheidungsnützlicher Informationen zu würdigen.

Der Hauptteil dieser Arbeit befasst sich zunächst mit der bilanziellen Abbildung von RF-Transaktionen beim Kunden (Abschnitt I). Hierbei bildet ein Schwerpunkt der Ausführungen die Bilanzierung von RF-Transaktionen nach IFRS 9 i.V.m. IAS 1 hinsichtlich Ansatz, Bewertung und Ausweis des "klassischen" Falls und dem ausweisbestimmenden Sonderfall bei Bestehen eines abstrakten Schuldanerkenntnisses (Abschnitt I.2). Im Anschluss daran wird auf die Abbildung vorgenannter Transaktionen in der Kapitalflussrechnung (KFR) gem. IAS 7 Bezug genommen und die Standardänderungen vor dem Gesichtspunkt der Informationsfunktion der KFR analysiert (Abschnitt I.3). Zum Schluss des Kapitels der kundenseitigen Bilanzierung widmet sich die vorliegende Arbeit den Anhangangaben nach IFRS 7 und IAS 7 im Zusammenhang mit RF-Transaktionen (Abschnitt I.4). Danach wird die bilanzielle Abbildung beim Lieferanten in Betracht genommen (Abschnitt II).

Rechtlicher Rahmen und Würdigung der aktuellen Änderungen an IFRS 7 und IAS 7

Die Bilanzierung von Reverse-Factoring-Transaktionen nach IFRS

The author proposes and defends a constitutional amendment to require that laws of Congress be upheld unless the Supreme Court by unanimous vote decides that a particular law is unconstitutional. This will strengthen the people's right to be governed by majority rule, including in cases where rights are concerned.

The author proposes and defends a constitutional amendment to require that laws of Congress be upheld unless the Supreme Court by unanimous vote decides that a particular law is unconstitutional. This will strengthen the people’s right to be governed by majority rule, including in cases where rights are concerned.

Democratic Rule or Judicial Fiat?

Regulating Our Constitutional Rights

How the Supreme Court Ignored the Constitution and Enabled Mass Incarceration

Justice Abandoned

Document from the year 2017 in the subject Law - Civil / Private / Trade / Anti Trust Law / Business Law, , language: English, abstract: The Arbitration Law of India (which possesss huge potential to become a global hub for Arbitration) has undergone a change after the recent Amendments of 2015. This book contains an analysis of Indian law of Arbitration, id est The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 alongwith recent amendments of 2015.

The book contains section by section in-depth analysis with help of recent relevant judicial pronouncements. The book also contains a separate chapter on recent landmark judicial pronouncements by Indian Courts which has led to improving image of India from anti Arbitration to Pro-Arbitration state.

As the recent scandal shows, the IRS is big, bad, and out of control. Grover Norquist analyzes the problems within the agency and presents solutions to rein them in.
The driving force behind the American Revolution was our forefathers' refusal to accept unfair taxation. Citizens rose up, won a war against impossible odds, and established the most unique government on the face of the earth, with taxes set at about 2 percent.
How much has changed since 1776?
The strength of Americans' resolve is still unrivaled, and Grover Norquist, founder and president of Americans for Tax Reform, knows that once liberty-loving Americans learn the truth behind the oppressive and prosperity-stifling taxes we face today, they'll rise up again.
Urging his fellow citizens to join him, Norquist tells a powerful and urgent story that will convince you we must act now to END THE IRS BEFORE IT ENDS US.

As the recent scandal shows, the IRS is big, bad, and out of control. Grover Norquist analyzes the problems within the agency and presents solutions to rein them in. The driving force behind the American Revolution was our forefathers' refusal to accept unfair taxation. Citizens rose up, won a war against impossible odds, and established the most unique government on the face of the earth, with taxes set at about 2 percent. How much has changed since 1776? The strength of Americans resolve is still unrivaled, and Grover Norquist, founder and president of Americans for Tax Reform, knows that once liberty-loving Americans learn the truth behind the oppressive and prosperity-stifling taxes we face today, they'll rise up again. Urging his fellow citizens to join him, Norquist tells a powerful and urgent story that will convince you we must act now to End This Before It Ends Us.

How to Restore a Low Tax, High Growth, Wealthy America

End the IRS Before It Ends Us

An influential legal scholar argues that the Supreme Court played a pivotal role in the rise of mass incarceration in America. With less than 5 percent of the world's population and almost a quarter of its prisoners, America indisputably has a mass incarceration problem. How did it happen? Tough-on-crime politics and the war on drugs are obvious and important culprits, but another factor has received little attention: the Supreme Court. Since the 1960s, the Court has repeatedly disregarded constitutional limits on the state's power to lock people away. Justice Abandoned highlights six decisions that made mass incarceration possible. These rulings have been crucial to the rise in pretrial detention and coercive plea bargaining. They have blessed disproportionate sentencing and overcrowded prisons. And they have sanctioned innumerable police stops and widespread racial discrimination. If the Court were committed to protecting constitutional rights, none of these cases would have been decided as they were. Rachel Barkow offers a roadmap for change, showing that the originalist methodology adopted by the majority of the current Court demands overturning the unconstitutional policies underlying mass incarceration. If the justices genuinely believe in upholding the Constitution, then they have little choice but to reverse the wrongly decided precedents that have failed so many Americans.

Know Your Rights

Weitere Titel zum Thema