Über uns

À propos de nous

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Karriere

Carrière

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Impressum

Mentions légales

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Datenbanken

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Autorenstimmen

Témoignages

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Partner

Partenaires

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Unsere Funktionen

Nos fonctions

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Gesamtkatalog

Catalogue complet

Studien zu Staat, Recht und Verwaltung

David Schwarzenböck

Rechtsextremismus in der Justiz?

Das Richteramt zwischen Unabhängigkeit und Verfassungstreue

Warum ich bleibe, wo man streiten und gemeinsam anpacken muss!Ein Plädoyer gegen Schwarz-Weiß-Denken und für den Versuch eines Miteinanders, wenn die Gegensätze unüberwindbar scheinen. Keine einfachen Antworten, aber ein offenherziger und selbstkritischer Versuch, herauszufinden, was jetzt noch einen Unterschied machen könnte.Nach vielen Jahren in Rostock kehrt Monchi, Sänger von Feine Sahne Fischfilet, in die vorpommersche Provinz zurück. Als bei der Bundestagswahl 54 Prozent der Stimmen in seinem Geburtsort, wo er fast jeden kennt, an die AfD gehen, kann er es kaum fassen. Dabei weiß Monchi längst: Ein Leben hier funktioniert nur neben- und miteinander, trotz aller Kontraste. Die Kneipe, in der die Band ihr Festival plant, wird auch für den AfD-Stammtisch genutzt. Auf dem Grundstück neben dem Proberaum wurde eine schwarz-weiß-rote Flagge gehisst. Aber die verschiedensten Menschen helfen mit, als ein Skatepark für die Jugend gebaut wird.Welche Ängste haben sie, welche Hoffnungen? Wie kann man es schaffen, trotz allem optimistisch in die Zukunft zu schauen? Monchi will bleiben, wo sich schon so viele verabschiedet haben, will vor Ort etwas bewegen. Um hoffentlich dort alt werden zu können, wo er es so sehr liebt wie nirgends sonst.&nbsp;

Über mein Leben in der ostdeutschen Provinz

Jenseits der Brandmauer

Landmark Cases

From Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL to Cassis de Dijon and Consten and Grundig, Landmark Cases in EU Law explores the most important and well-known EU law cases in two volumes. These volumes show how the European Court of Justice has played a fundamental role in the construction of the European Union in the past 70 years. Many EU 'landmark' cases have been controversial, yet no-one can deny that they have been essential in defining the Union legal order as we find it today. Volume 2 explores the 'substantive' cases that have shaped the Union's internal market, its competition law as well as its internal and external policies. Each of the twenty cases within this volume is placed in its historical and doctrinal context, and each chapter also presents the history of its reception by the Court and academia.

Substantive Cases

Landmark Cases in EU Law, Volume 2

Schriften zum Recht der Digitalisierung

Digitalization is leading to far-reaching changes in the area of jurisdiction. The use of specialist applications and the nationwide introduction of eFiles in all courts by January 1, 2026 means that judicial activities are increasingly permeated by technology. Central IT service providers are required to organize digitization and perform tasks in the area of data storage and data center operation. In most countries, the central IT service providers of the general administration are also responsible for this in the courts. Against this background, it is questionable to what extent such organizational models are compatible with the principle of separation of powers. The principle of the organizational independence of the courts under Art. 20 para. 2 sentence 2 in conjunction with Art. 92 Basic Lawis of central importance. Frederik Thomasen sets out minimum requirements for the separation of their IT infrastructures in order to avoid inadmissible interdependence between courts and administrations. In addition, digitalization poses new risks to judicial independence, which is protected under Article 97 of the Basic Law. On the one hand, there is a threat from the use of software as a digital tool, in particular the use of automated software and applications that use artificial intelligence methods to support judicial decision-making. On the other hand, new possibilities for accessing judicial data pose a threat. The author then develops basic measures to protect judicial independence from these dangers. Of particular importance here is the control of data processing by IT control commissions made up of judges.

Verfassungsrechtliche Maßgaben an die Digitalisierung der Dritten Gewalt

Gewaltenteilung im digitalen Staat

Arbeits- und Sozialrecht

Nach ständiger Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts ist es unzulässig, zwischen Arbeitern und Angestellten zu unterscheiden. Gesetze, mit denen früher Angestellte privilegiert wurden, sind seit über zwanzig Jahren abgeschafft. Gleiches gilt für Tarifverträge, die ehedem gleichfalls diese Unterscheidung enthielten. Heute existieren nur noch die Tarifverträge über die Sozialkassen in der Bauwirtschaft, die diese Unterscheidung enthalten. Die Tarifverträge werden regelmäßig vom zuständigen Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales für allgemeinverbindlich erklärt, obwohl sie eine wesentliche Schlechterstellung von Arbeitern vorsehen. Im hiesigen Band geht es um den damit verbundenen Verfassungsverstoß.

Ungleichbehandlung von Arbeitern und Angestellten in den Tarifverträgen der SOKA-BAU

Wie die Migrationsdebatte die Gesellschaft spaltet – ein ehemaliger Bundespolizist spricht Klartext - Die Insider-Analyse des SPIEGEL-Bestseller-Autors

Europa zerbricht an seinen Grenzen

This book presents a new perspective on the debate around legitimacy, politics and constitutional law in Supreme Courts. Moving away from the troubling perception that Supreme Courts are trampling on the wrong side of the law/politics divide, it accepts and defends the critical claim that constitutional law is intrinsically and inescapably politics: in style, substance and outcome. It explains what is involved in that claim and recommends a more nuanced and compelling account than it is caricatured to be. The book proceeds to demonstrate how the legal and judicial process can proceed if the law-is-politics critique is taken seriously. Insisting that it cannot be business as usual, the author offers a series of constructive proposals about how constitutional law and judicial decision-making can continue in anything like their present format and style. Recognising that a more radical approach could be taken to the way in which democracy might re-organise, the book runs with the idea that it is possible to incorporate and accommodate the law-is-politics argument within a governmental system of constitutional democracy that resembles closely what now occurs. In that sense, the book is both critical and constructive as well as principled and pragmatic.

Courts, Constitutions and Politics

Rethinking Legitimacy

This book offers the first ever in-depth analysis of the emerging constitutionalism in South Sudan and the challenges it faces. The book critically analyses the constitution-making processes that occurred in South Sudan between 2005 and 2011, finding, among other things, that there was a failure of constitutional discourse, particularly in relation to the 2011 drafting process of the Transitional Constitution. It goes on to analyse how the constitution is being implemented. It finds that, despite the clear division of powers and functions between the national government and the sub-national governments, what has emerged in South Sudan in the post-constitution-making period is a form of coercive centralism where the national government controls much of the political decision-making process. This has had serious implications for democracy, constitutionalism, and the rule of law. Finally, bearing in mind the failure in both how the transitional constitution was made and how it is being implemented, the book undertakes a critical analysis of the proposed process for drafting a new constitution for South Sudan. It identifies serious shortcomings and proposes how these could be addressed to enhance the process.

Challenges and Opportunities

Emerging Constitutionalism in South Sudan

Courts are context-conscious. They solve legal disputes with societal impact in mind, using interpretive tools and procedural means. This book develops concepts and methods for a systematic and legally informative analysis of this complex process. The evidence delivered prompts a conversation about the authority courts have to change the law. The analysis focuses on the European Court of Justice and its free movement case law. The framework and theory, however, are relevant to courts and case law everywhere. This is a compelling and intriguing examination of the ECJ and its shaping of a key tenet of EU law.

The European Court of Justice as a Context-Conscious Lawmaker

Good Judgment

Constitutionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean

This book examines the reasoning practice of 15 constitutional courts and supreme courts, including the Caribbean Commonwealth and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.Enriched by empirical data, with which it strives to contribute to a constructive and well-informed debate, the volume analyses how Latin American courts justify their decisions.


Based on original data and a region-specific methodology, the book provides a systematic analysis utilising more than 600 leading cases. It shows which interpretive methods and concepts are most favoured by Latin American courts, and which courts were the most prolific in their reasoning activities.


The volume traces the features of judicial dialogue on a regional and sub-regional level and enables the evaluation and comparison of each country's reasoning culture in different epochs. The collection includes several graphs to visualise the changes and tendencies of the reasoning practices throughout time in the region, based on information gathered from the dataset.


To better understand the current functioning and the future tendencies of courts in Latin America and the Caribbean, the volume illuminates how constitutional and supreme courts have actually been making their decisions in the selected landmark cases, which could also contribute to future successful litigation strategies for both national constitutional courts and the Inter-American Court for Human Rights.


This project was made possible due to the collaboration and funding provided by the Rule of Law Programme for Latin America of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation and the Law School of the University of San Francisco de Quito.

Constitutional Reasoning in Latin America and the Caribbean

Recht - schnell erfasst

Welche Rechte und Pflichten hat der einzelne Bürger, welche der Staat? Wie funktioniert unsere Gemeinschaft? Diese Grundfragen klärt das Buch und nimmt auf Auszüge des Grundgesetzes und des Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetzes Bezug. In jedem Band der Reihe "Recht - schnell erfasst" werden die wichtigsten Normen im Wortlaut vorgestellt, verständlich kommentiert und mit den - für die gelungene Fallbearbeitung - notwendigen Verweisungen versehen. Wer bei der Lösung von Problemstellungen schnell auf den Punkt kommen will, ohne sich mit juristischen Theorien auseinandersetzen zu müssen, findet in diesem Buch alles, was er dafür braucht.

Verfassungsrecht - Schnell erfasst

Beiträge zum Arbeitsrecht

When does an employee with extremist convictions violate the duties of loyalty and consideration arising from the employment relationship? In any event, the employee does not owe a particular political attitude; an extremist attitude therefore does not in itself constitute a breach of duty-it can at most be the cause or motivation for such a breach. Frederik Stadelmann shows that a culpable disruption of industrial peace exists only if the disruption can be normatively attributed to the employee. Through political activity, the employee must not prevent colleagues from performing their work or neglect their own work obligations. The employee likewise acts in breach of duty in cases of physical assaults against colleagues or the employer, as well as in cases of infringements of personal honour or discrimination against colleagues within the meaning of the General Equal Treatment Act (AGG). As a rule, political activity in the context of official contact with the employer's customers or business partners is impermissible. By contrast, a mere violation of general moral standards does not yet amount to misconduct; political correctness is not owed. Where the employee acts outside working hours, the decisive factor is whether their conduct, insofar as it relates to the employment relationship, impairs the employer's legitimate interests. Finally, the author discusses the requirements for termination by the employer on the grounds of the employee's politically extremist activities.

Treuepflichten des Arbeitnehmers im Spannungsfeld politischer Betätigung

Extremistische Arbeitnehmer

Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory

A collection of essays from Dieter Grimm, Germany's most renowned constitutional scholar, shining a light on the jurisprudence of the German Constitutional Court.

Between Law and Politics

Constitutional Courts and Judicial Review

Rechtsextremismus in der Justiz?

Autres titres sur ce thème