<div class="raw-html-embed"> <a href="https://staempflirecht.ch/schweizerische-zivilprozessordnung-art-1352-zpo-sowie-art-400408-zpo/ean-9783727222108">
 Jetzt bestellen
</a>
: Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (Art. 1–352 ZPO sowie Art. 400–408 ZPO)</div>

Über uns

À propos de nous

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Karriere

Carrière

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Impressum

Mentions légales

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Datenbanken

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Autorenstimmen

Témoignages

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Partner

Partenaires

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Unsere Funktionen

Nos fonctions

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Gesamtkatalog

Catalogue complet

Studien zu Staat, Recht und Verwaltung

David Schwarzenböck

Rechtsextremismus in der Justiz?

Das Richteramt zwischen Unabhängigkeit und Verfassungstreue

This book reassesses AV Dicey's legacy in political and legal thought through the reflections of leading scholars who consider his importance not only in today's British constitutional and legal culture but also in other foreign constitutional cultures. Every student in law and in politics, every law faculty and most legal practitioners in the world are aware of who Albert Venn Dicey (1835-1922) was and what he wrote. Yet, this fame does not mean that Dicey's legacy is not controversial and debated in the present world. This book considers why Dicey's late Victorian constitutional and political thinking is still alive. In spite of all the transformations that have taken place in public law in the UK in the last hundred years, the book argues that Dicey managed to grasp and to crystallise something of the British political identity and culture. Hence the long-lasting fire-power of his constitutional and political thinking. The book also considers that there is something even more prescient in Dicey's writings, for the UK but also for countries that have adopted his understanding of the rule of law and/or of parliamentary government. Dicey identified one of the most fundamental political issues at stake: the nature of the relationship between public law and democracy. The book looks closely at the alliance between public law and democratic spirit. This alliance needs to be reassessed from a legal, historical and comparative perspective. This edited collection, gathering authors from different countries, from various legal systems and from diverse backgrounds, tackles this task.

The Enduring Legacy of a Victorian Constitutionalist

Twenty-First Century Perspectives on the Scholarship of AV Dicey

Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory

A collection of essays from Dieter Grimm, Germany's most renowned constitutional scholar, shining a light on the jurisprudence of the German Constitutional Court.

Between Law and Politics

Constitutional Courts and Judicial Review

A groundbreaking analysis of Frederick Douglass as constitutional theorist, showing how his vision, which prefigured today's originalism, melded history and natural rights to address the evil of slavery. In his celebrated address "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?" Frederick Douglass excoriated America's hypocritical celebration of freedom. But he did not blame the nation's founding document for enabling the evil of slavery. Rather, he proclaimed that "interpreted as it ought to be interpreted, the Constitution is a glorious liberty document." This was no mere rhetorical flourish. Examining Douglass not just as an activist but as a legal and political theorist, Until the Last Yoke Is Broken reveals that his abolitionism was guided by rigorous constitutional interpretation. Reconstructing Douglass's method from his speeches and writings, Bradley Rebeiro shows that his approach both anticipated and challenged aspects of contemporary originalism. Like today's originalists, Douglass saw historical meaning as central to constitutional analysis. But unlike today's originalism, Douglass's goes beyond simply asking how the Constitution was understood at its ratification. Instead, Douglass insisted that whenever a constitutional provision is ambiguous, the interpreter must adopt whatever meaning best comports with the natural rights affirmed in the Declaration of Independence. Rebeiro also shows how Douglass balanced this constitutional vision with pragmatism during Reconstruction. When political exigencies pitted the fate of black suffrage against women's suffrage, Douglass forsook the theoretically pure for the politically possible; as soon as black suffrage was secured, he returned to advocating for universal voting rights. "It was mine to stand for the freedom of people of all colors," Douglass wrote near the end of his life, "until in our land the last yoke was broken and the last bondsman was set free."

The Constitutional Vision of Frederick Douglass

Until the Last Yoke Is Broken

Challenging decades of scholarship and Supreme Court jurisprudence, newly discovered historical documents reveal that the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause was meant to protect only the freedom to worship, not broader rights of conscience. The First Amendment proclaims that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This language has been taken to provide sweeping constitutional protection for the freedom of belief and the freedom to act on one's beliefs, underpinning conscience-based claims by people seeking to avoid military service, mandatory schooling for their children, or being required to work on the Sabbath. Recently, religious traditionalists have appealed to the Free Exercise Clause to seek exemptions from laws connected with abortion, contraception, and same-sex marriage. In The Free Exercise Clause and the Rights of Conscience, Donald Drakeman demonstrates that such readings of the First Amendment are dramatically overbroad. Numerous newly available sources clearly show that when the Bill of Rights was ratified, Americans understood "free exercise of religion" as a well-established term of art referring solely to the ability to hold public worship services. That meaning remained unchanged well into the twentieth century. Time and again, when believers asked the courts for conscience-based exemptions from statutes, judges turned them down, telling them to address the legislature instead. It was only in the mid-twentieth century that the Supreme Court radically reimagined the Free Exercise Clause, granting religious exemptions from statutory duties for the first time in American history. As a result, today's Free Exercise Clause bears little resemblance to that of the framers and the American tradition of religious liberty. Given the current Supreme Court's heavy emphasis on original meaning and tradition when interpreting the Constitution, Drakeman's discovery could have significant implications for the future of conscience-based exemptions and the First Amendment itself.

The Free Exercise Clause and the Rights of Conscience

Ist die Zukunft unserer Demokratie populistisch? Narrative wie Brandmauern oder "Kampf gegen Rechts" können ihre Wirkung verfehlen und gesellschaftliche Spaltungen beschleunigen statt lindern. Die aktuellen Nervositäten der Gesellschaft und die Auswirkungen auf die Politik, die zu diesem Befund führen, stellt Fedor Rose in seinem Buch dar. Selbst Repräsentant des Mainstreams hinterfragt er, was falsch gelaufen ist, dass der Einfluss der etablierten Kräfte sinkt und kaum noch Vertrauen in Personen und Institutionen besteht. Wie kann man das Vertrauen der Menschen zurückgewinnen? Und gibt es diese Chance überhaupt noch? Roses Antwort: Es hilft nur eine veränderte Politik. Dafür muss die politische Mitte "All in" gehen, denn es geht um die Demokratie, wie wir sie schätzen.

Ist die Zukunft unserer Demokratie populistisch? Narrative wie Brandmauern oder "Kampf gegen Rechts" können ihre Wirkung verfehlen und gesellschaftliche Spaltungen beschleunigen statt lindern. Die aktuellen Nervositäten der Gesellschaft und die Auswirkungen auf die Politik, die zu diesem Befund führen, stellt Fedor Rose in seinem Buch dar. Selbst Repräsentant des Mainstreams hinterfragt er, was falsch gelaufen ist, dass der Einfluss der etablierten Kräfte sinkt und kaum noch Vertrauen in Personen und Institutionen besteht. Wie kann man das Vertrauen der Menschen zurückgewinnen? Und gibt es diese Chance überhaupt noch? Roses Antwort: Es hilft nur eine veränderte Politik. Dafür muss die politische Mitte "All in" gehen, denn es geht um die Demokratie, wie wir sie schätzen.

Wie Mainstream-Politik wieder Mehrheiten gewinnen kann

All in

Modern Studies in European Law

The Transformation of European Administrative Law

Judging Composite Decision-Making

The Federal Constitutional Court Act of April 1951 has institutionalised the Federal Constitutional Court as a judicial organ, two years after the Basic Law entered into force. Seventy-five years later, constitutional law scholars have dedicated a 
 Festschrift
 to the Court. The book aims to describe and analyse the Court as an actor in constitutional life as well as its sustaining influence on constitutional development. The contributions examine from a scholarly observer's perspective how the Court's decisions are produced, presented, and communicated; how constitutional principles are safeguarded, specified, and developed; and how numerous transformations in constitutional and public law are enabled, accompanied, and initiated.

Festschrift 75 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgericht

Verfassungsrechtspflege

This book offers the first ever in-depth analysis of the emerging constitutionalism in South Sudan and the challenges it faces. The book critically analyses the constitution-making processes that occurred in South Sudan between 2005 and 2011, finding, among other things, that there was a failure of constitutional discourse, particularly in relation to the 2011 drafting process of the Transitional Constitution. It goes on to analyse how the constitution is being implemented. It finds that, despite the clear division of powers and functions between the national government and the sub-national governments, what has emerged in South Sudan in the post-constitution-making period is a form of coercive centralism where the national government controls much of the political decision-making process. This has had serious implications for democracy, constitutionalism, and the rule of law. Finally, bearing in mind the failure in both how the transitional constitution was made and how it is being implemented, the book undertakes a critical analysis of the proposed process for drafting a new constitution for South Sudan. It identifies serious shortcomings and proposes how these could be addressed to enhance the process.

Challenges and Opportunities

Emerging Constitutionalism in South Sudan

Schriften zum Recht der Digitalisierung

Digitalization is leading to far-reaching changes in the area of jurisdiction. The use of specialist applications and the nationwide introduction of eFiles in all courts by January 1, 2026 means that judicial activities are increasingly permeated by technology. Central IT service providers are required to organize digitization and perform tasks in the area of data storage and data center operation. In most countries, the central IT service providers of the general administration are also responsible for this in the courts. Against this background, it is questionable to what extent such organizational models are compatible with the principle of separation of powers. The principle of the organizational independence of the courts under Art. 20 para. 2 sentence 2 in conjunction with Art. 92 Basic Lawis of central importance. Frederik Thomasen sets out minimum requirements for the separation of their IT infrastructures in order to avoid inadmissible interdependence between courts and administrations. In addition, digitalization poses new risks to judicial independence, which is protected under Article 97 of the Basic Law. On the one hand, there is a threat from the use of software as a digital tool, in particular the use of automated software and applications that use artificial intelligence methods to support judicial decision-making. On the other hand, new possibilities for accessing judicial data pose a threat. The author then develops basic measures to protect judicial independence from these dangers. Of particular importance here is the control of data processing by IT control commissions made up of judges.

Verfassungsrechtliche Maßgaben an die Digitalisierung der Dritten Gewalt

Gewaltenteilung im digitalen Staat

The Scottish Legal System sets out to present the legal system and law of Scotland as unique and constantly changing and places the Scottish legal system in its broader political and social contexts. This well-established text provides an up-to-date treatment of all significant developments affecting the Scottish legal system. It covers not only the central aspects of the system, such as the courts and the legal profession, but also the common areas with constitutional law and jurisprudence. The Seventh Edition includes new case law on devolution and human rights issues in Scotland. It also covers the changes to the sources of law of the European Union and the principles of application of EU law following Brexit. This title is included in Bloomsbury Professional's Scots Law Student online service.

A course on the Scottish legal system is a compulsory part of undergraduate degrees in Scots Law. The Scottish Legal System sets out to present the legal system and law of Scotland as unique and constantly changing and places the Scottish legal system in its broader political and social contexts. This well-established text provides an up-to-date treatment of all significant developments affecting the Scottish legal system. It covers not only the central aspects of the system, such as the courts and the legal profession, but also the common areas with constitutional law and jurisprudence. The seventh edition will include new case law on devolution and human rights issues in Scotland. It will also cover the changes to the sources of law of the European Union and the principles of application of EU law following Brexit. This title is included in Bloomsbury Professional's Scots Law Student online service.

The Scottish Legal System

Astonishing, unconstrained, and often unsettling-the presidential pardon is one of the most powerful tools in American government, and this indispensable book is your guide to how it defines the presidency, justice, and politics. The Constitution's Pardon Clause grants the president a power unmatched in scope and consequence. In The Presidential Pardon, legal scholar Saikrishna Prakash explores how this brief clause has grown into the most expansive and controversial tool of the modern presidency. Originally intended as a mechanism of mercy-to temper harsh laws and foster reconciliation-the pardon was once used with solemnity and circumspection. Today, it has evolved into a blunt and potent political instrument. Presidents use it to shield allies, reward supporters, fulfill campaign promises, and make political statements. In January 2025, for instance, the outgoing and incoming presidents issued major pardons-one to protect relatives and allies, the other to deliver on a pledge to his electoral coalition. These actions mark a turning point: the pardon power is no longer a curious exception to politics but increasingly a feature of it. Pardons have become a continuation of politics by other means. Prakash, a preeminent expert on constitutional law and the executive branch of government, delivers an engaging and accessible analysis of this transformation. The Presidential Pardon brings together little-known history, sharp political insight, and learned constitutional interpretation in a timely examination of executive power. As the partisan exercise of pardon grows more routine, Prakash asks: Can our rule of law survive a presidential power that is checked by no one?

The Short Clause with a Long, Troubled History

The Presidential Pardon

Dokumentation seiner Entstehung

Das Grundgesetz Band 15

Rechtsextremismus in der Justiz?

Weitere Titel zum Thema