Über uns

À propos de nous

Open Access

Karriere

Carrière

Aboverträge Kündigen

Résiliation d’abonnement

Vertrag widerrufen

Résiliation de contrat 

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Impressum

Mentions légales

Barrierefreiheit

Accessibilité

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

Libra

Was ist Libra?

C'est quoi Libra ?

Kostenlos testen

Tester gratuitement

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Aktienrecht

Droit des sociétés anonymes

Persönlichkeitsrecht

Droit de la personnalité

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Digitales Angebot

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Swisslex

Dienstleistungen

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Open Access Policy

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Partner

Partenaires

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Sortiment & Suche

Catalogue & Recherche

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Gesamtkatalog

Catalogue complet

Fachkatalog Recht

Catalogue de droit

J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Thomas Nehrlich

Erik Schilling

Ferdinand von Schirach

Zwischen Literatur und Recht

&lt;p&gt;1. Die Novelle als forensische Leitgattung. Zu den Erzählungen Ferdinand von Schirachs.- 2. „Ich erzählte seine Geschichte“. Zur Leselenkung in den Stories Ferdinand von Schirachs.- 3. „Von einem Apfelbaum im Paradies“? Zur Apfelsymbolik in Ferdinand von Schirachs Kurzgeschichtenband Verbrechen.- 4. Der Verteidiger als doppelter Erzähler in Schirachs Story-Trilogie.- 5. Hat Verbrechen ein Geschlecht? Gender und Delinquenz in Schirachs Erzählungen.- 6. Möglichkeiten des narrativen Modus. Die unterschiedlichen Erzählstile im Erzählband Verbrechen und der Kriminalserie Verbrechen – nach Ferdinand von Schirach.- 7. Die Verführung der Sexpuppe. Zeigen und Sehen in Schuld – nach Ferdinand von Schirach.- 8. Über die Dekonstruktion zeitgenössischer Serialitätskonzepte in der Anthologieserie Ferdinand von Schirach: Strafe.- 9. Dilemmata der Moralphilosophie als öffentlich-rechtliches Fernsehspiel. Zu Ferdinand von Schirachs Feinde.- 10. Fall und Fallgeschichte in Ferdinand von Schirachs Stories. Ein interdisziplinärer Austausch zwischen Literatur- und Rechtswissenschaft.- 11. Recht oder Richtig? Selbstjustiz in Ferdinand von Schirachs Der Fall Collini und Terror.- 12. Zur Darstellung der Sterbehilfe-Diskurse in Ferdinand von Schirachs Gott.- 13. Ein Dichterjurist als Politikaktivist. Die Grundrechterhetorik in Ferdinand von Schirachs Jeder Mensch.- 14. Schirachs Recht.- 15. Evidenz des Faktischen? Bemerkungen zum Erzählverfahren in Ferdinand von Schirachs Stories.- 16. Schirach liest Kleist. Spuren einer dichterjuristischen Wahlverwandtschaft.- 17. Auf der Suche nach dem roten Faden. Intertextualität im Werk Ferdinand von Schirachs am Beispiel des Romans Der Fall Collini.- 18. Das Einzelne, das Besondere und das Allgemeine. Ferdinand von Schirachs autobiographische Kurzprosa-Bände Kaffee und Zigaretten und Nachmittage als Grundlage seiner Poetik.- 19. Deliktkatalog zu Ferdinand von Schirachs Stories&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

Focusing on legal science and its application, this book comprehensively examines the knowledge system, methodology, and values of judgment formation from theoretical jurisprudence to practical application. Tracing the development of legal science, the book analyzes the core connotations of legal rationality, emphasizing the certainty, scientific nature, and ethical aspects of judgments. Through a profound analysis of legal rationality, evidentiary methods, and judicial procedures in the context of adjudication, the book demonstrates how to achieve "good law and good governance" in judicial practice, providing theoretical guidance and practical direction for legal professionals.

Formation of Adjudication: Legal Science as Knowledge, Methodology and Value, and Its Application

International and Comparative Law in the Asia Pacific

Judicial Systems in Comparative Perspective

Beck Paperback

Die Wut muss die Seite wechseln 
 
 Nicht alle Männer sind Täter. Aber ihr Schweigen macht sie zu Komplizen. Zehn Jahre nach #MeToo fragt Viktoria Morasch: Warum ist Gewalt gegen Frauen noch immer vor allem Frauensache? Ein Essay über männliches Wegsehen, weibliche Angst ? und eine radikale Forderung: Jetzt sind die Männer dran, für ein besseres Verhältnis der Geschlechter zu kämpfen. Kein Täter sein ist nicht genug. 
 
 Moraschs Essay ist persönlich und streitbar. Als Journalistin hat sie selbst zu #MeToo recherchiert und erlebt, welchen Widerständen Frauen begegnen, wenn sie über Macht und Gewalt sprechen. Ihre zentrale Forderung lautet: Kein Täter zu sein, reicht nicht mehr. Männer müssen aktiv Verantwortung für das Verhalten anderer Männer übernehmen, widersprechen, Grenzen ziehen und eingreifen. Morasch will in ihrem Text keine neue Front zwischen den Geschlechtern eröffnen. Im Gegenteil. Ihre Antwort ist ebenso provokant wie hoffnungsvoll: Sie zeigt, dass wirkliche Nähe zwischen Frauen und Männern erst möglich sein wird, wenn Männer Gewalt gegen Frauen als ihr eigenes gesellschaftliches Problem begreifen.

Die Wut muss die Seite wechseln Nicht alle Männer sind Täter. Aber ihr Schweigen macht sie zu Komplizen. Zehn Jahre nach #MeToo fragt Viktoria Morasch: Warum ist Gewalt gegen Frauen noch immer vor allem ein Frauenthema? Ein Essay über männliches Wegsehen, weibliche Wachsamkeit - und eine radikale Forderung: Jetzt sind die Männer dran, für ein besseres Verhältnis der Geschlechter zu kämpfen. Kein Täter sein ist nicht genug. 
 Moraschs Essay ist persönlich und streitbar. Als Journalistin hat sie selbst zu #MeToo recherchiert und erlebt, welchen Widerständen Frauen begegnen, wenn sie über Macht und Gewalt sprechen. Ihre Forderung lautet: Kein Täter zu sein, reicht nicht mehr. Männer müssen Verantwortung für das Verhalten anderer Männer übernehmen, widersprechen, Grenzen ziehen und eingreifen. Morasch will in ihrem Text keine neue Front zwischen den Geschlechtern eröffnen. Im Gegenteil. Ihre Antwort ist ebenso provokant wie hoffnungsvoll: Sie zeigt, dass wirkliche Nähe zwischen Frauen und Männern erst möglich sein wird, wenn Männer Gewalt gegen Frauen als ihr eigenes Problem begreifen.

Kein Täter sein ist nicht genug

#YouToo

Gender Perspectives in Law

This volume opens a dialogue between the Global-South and the Global North by exploring gender-based oppression and deprivation across different registers of power, entitlement, privilege, discrimination, exclusion, and deprivation. It pays close attention to the different dimensions of power-relations that perpetrate inequality and discrimination through distinct intersections of race, class, gender, caste, nation, culture, religion, sexual orientation, and social and economic disparity, and examines multiple struggles for rights, recognition, inclusion, dignity and justice, channeled through social movements and claims made upon the law and the state. Instead of taking the South and the North as self-evident and coherent discursive and political concept-entities, the volume brings legal, gender and feminist studies scholars and activists, anthropologists, historians, and social scientists concerned with injustice, oppression and discrimination from across the globe on the multiple meanings and varied dimensions of the South and the North as they get articulated in the intersecting axes of power, violence and oppression in everyday practices. The volume critically considers patriarchy and the liberal idea of emancipation, keeping in mind ‘non-liberal’ feminine and non-binary subjects located in different parts of the world, and complements and extends feminist perspectives and understandings. Contributions deal with critical race, Global-South, anti-colonial and postcolonial feminisms that seriously engage with what it considers to be the North and conjunctions and disjunctions between the South and the North in articulations of male-centric, capitalist and other forms of violence and domination that shore-up vulnerability and dispossession. Considered accounts of the multi-layered gender-based inequality in the North and its juxtaposition with the South are included. Apart from making visible and denouncing the oppression, violence and the injustice, the volume also considers the agency of women and gender-diverse and marginalized persons, i.e. points to the many alternatives and proposals that oppressed populations articulate within the landscape of Global North-Global South relationships.

Global South-Global North Interplay

Gender, Law, and Power

SpringerBriefs in Law

When is One Evidence Better than Another?

Best Evidence and Burden of Proof

In this unique volume, 14 of the US's most distinguished writers pull back the curtain on their processes whilst drafting their works of creative nonfiction. Using side-by-side examples of first drafts and final versions of their writing, including original full-page reproductions from the writers' personal notebooks, an original, illuminating essay accompanies each draft, recounting the journey from inspiration to completion. Offering a generous insight into the creative process from the rough bold strokes to refined, clear, elegant prose, this behind-the-scenes look delves into the creative minds of working writers, including African American, Latin, Asian American, and Indigenous writers from across the US. An invaluable resource for students and instructors looking to enliven the classroom or offering practicing writers a peak into the processes of their peers, this book presents the false starts and missteps, the self-editing, tinkering, cutting, rearranging and craft working writers make in the plight for perfectly polished prose. The Art of Revising Creative Nonfiction is an enlightening and unparalleled collection of modern-day creativity in action, a must have for aspiring writers and teachers of all levels.

14 U.S. Writers on their Drafts, Craft, and Process

The Art of Revising Creative Nonfiction

Most composition textbooks begin with skills like thesis writing and paragraph structure. This one begins with a person.Writing as Self-Design is a transformative textbook in which students examine control of information and discover their agency in meaning-making. Informed by neuroscience, rhetorical theory, digital literacy, and composition pedagogy, this book challenges students to question how meaning is made, filtered, and constrained in the digital age, and to develop their unique voices through composition strategies that reclaim writing as an act of self-design. It is a book which responds to the technological landscape in which we find ourselves.Rather than convincing students of the value of research and writing, Writing as Self-Design allows them to discover their own emotional value through enhanced agency in inquiry and resistance. Through this textbook, composition becomes a space in which students question information control, the hedonic cycle of passive consumption, and their greater agency in creativity and intentional design. Recognizing the ubiquity of tools like AI, this book encourages critical examination of how and why they are used. Students engage with algorithmic bias, misinformation, datafication, and the influence of platforms like Google, TikTok, and ChatGPT: not just as topics, but as forces that shape the way they think, write, and relate to the world. The value of Writing as Self-Design will resonate well beyond the classroom, addressing the importance of the critical skills needed to navigate the "total noise" of our media-saturated lives, build personal definitions of success, and rediscover the creative cycle that leads to lasting happiness and fulfilment.

Finding Voice and Agency Through Composition

Writing as Self-Design

Der moderne Staat lebt vom Geld der anderen. Er belastet Arbeit, Konsum und Unternehmertum - und seine Repräsentanten wundern sich über stagnierende Dynamik, wachsende Ungleichheit und schwindendes Vertrauen. 
Seit Jahrzehnten wird am Steuerrecht repariert. Doch was, wenn das Problem nicht die falsche Steuer ist, sondern das System dahinter? Dieses Buch stellt eine radikale, aber nüchterne These auf: Der Steuerstaat ist keine technische Notwendigkeit, sondern eine historisch gewachsene Fehlkonstruktion. Eine Umverteilungsmaschine, die privat erarbeitete Einkommen sozialisiert, damit öffentlich geschaffene Werte privatisiert werden können. Vor allem aber trennt er systematisch Geben und Nehmen: Wer zahlt, erkennt kaum Nutzen hieraus; wer profitiert, trägt die Kosten nicht unmittelbar. 
Dirk Löhr zeigt, warum "gute Besteuerung" ein Widerspruch in sich ist. Warum der Staat Arbeit, Unternehmertum und Konsum besteuert, aber ökonomische Renten - Bodenrenten, Monopolgewinne, Netzwerkrenten - weitgehend verschont. Und warum genau diese Logik Märkte verzerrt, politische Verantwortung entkoppelt und die Gegenseitigkeit untergräbt, auf der demokratische Legitimität beruht. 
Der Schlüssel zu einer besseren Staatsfinanzierung liegt dort, wo Knappheit ohne Leistung Erträge erzeugt: in der Abschöpfung ökonomischer Renten statt der Belastung produktiver wirtschaftlicher Betätigung. Ein Staat, der Leistung nicht bestraft - und der dort, wo seine Leistungen unmittelbar zurechenbar sind, auf Gebühren setzt. Dies bedeutet ein Gleichgewicht von Geben und Nehmen und eine Gleichordnung von Bürger und Staat statt der heutigen Unterordnung. 
Ökonomisch fundiert, ordnungspolitisch durchdacht und politisch streitbar - dieses Buch stellt eine Grundannahme unserer Zeit infrage: dass der Steuerstaat alternativlos sei.

Ein Steuerstaat, den niemand braucht

Die Plünderung des Bürgers

Global Perspectives on Civil Justice

The Brazilian Experience

Precedents in the Civil Law

This book offers a comprehensive reconstruction of proportionality in constitutional law, tracing its trajectory from its origins in Prussian administrative law and German constitutional adjudication to its contemporary application across diverse legal systems. Against the conventional approaches that equate proportionality with the weighing of competing values, it argues that this test was originally conceived as a dogmatic instrument for the protection of rights, not as a balancing technique. Through a detailed comparative analysis of the German and Brazilian experiences, the book reconstructs how proportionality gradually shifted from a strict limit on state power to an open formula of judicial discretion, and proposes a coherent model to restore its normative function. The book critically re-examines the philosophical and theoretical assumptions that transformed proportionality into an indeterminate balancing exercise and reconstructs it as a structured dogmatic test defined by constitutional parameters of protection. Engaging with authors such as Robert Alexy, Bernhard Schlink and Ralf Poscher, it maps how proportionality became the dominant method of constitutional adjudication and how that dominance produced both methodological uncertainty and jurisprudential uniformity. Finally, it proposes a theoretical framework that distinguishes proportionality in the singular, as a general abstraction, from proportionalities in the plural, calibrated to the specificities of each right, context and mode of judicial review. This plural and context-sensitive approach restores the analytical precision that contemporary constitutional law often lacks. By combining historical analysis, comparative dogmatics and legal theory, the study contributes to current debates on the legitimacy and limits of judicial review, the boundaries of fundamental rights and the crisis of constitutional interpretation in modern democracies.

This book offers a comprehensive reconstruction of proportionality in constitutional law, tracing its trajectory from its origins in Prussian administrative law and German constitutional adjudication to its contemporary application across diverse legal systems. Against the conventional approaches that equate proportionality with the weighing of competing values, it argues that this test was originally conceived as a dogmatic instrument for the protection of rights, not as a balancing technique. Through a detailed comparative analysis of the German and Brazilian experiences, the book reconstructs how proportionality gradually shifted from a strict limit on state power to an open formula of judicial discretion, and proposes a coherent model to restore its normative function. The book critically re-examines the philosophical and theoretical assumptions that transformed proportionality into an indeterminate balancing exercise and reconstructs it as a structured dogmatic test defined by constitutional parameters of protection. Engaging with authors such as Robert Alexy, Bernhard Schlink and Ralf Poscher, it maps how proportionality became the dominant method of constitutional adjudication and how that dominance produced both methodological uncertainty and jurisprudential uniformity. Finally, it proposes a theoretical framework that distinguishes proportionality in the singular, as a general abstraction, from proportionalities in the plural, calibrated to the specificities of each right, context and mode of judicial review. This plural and context-sensitive approach restores the analytical precision that contemporary constitutional law often lacks. By combining historical analysis, comparative dogmatics and legal theory, the study contributes to current debates on the legitimacy and limits of judicial review, the boundaries of fundamental rights and the crisis of constitutional interpretation in modern democracies.

Origins, Models, and Dogmatic Reconstruction

Proportionality in Constitutional Law

Sustainable Development Goals Series

This volume provides a nuanced analysis of the profound impact left by the dissenting opinion in the Tokyo Trial by Justice Radha Binod Pal's&nbsp;ideological stance on modern international criminal law. It consists of a detailed examination of this bold opinion on post-war justice that built the legacy of Justice Radha Binod Pal. Through an interdisciplinary perspective, this collection analyses the contemporary impact of Justice Pal's dissent and his ideologies and how they can impact contemporary dialogue in international law revolving around fairness, justice, accountability and inclusivity in international law and global power dynamics. It explores the intersection of his critique with contemporary concerns such as the decolonisation of international law, the legitimacy of global legal institutions, and the pursuit of a just world order. By engaging with issues such as territorial conflicts, and the role of legal pluralism, this volume aligns with the broader objectives of SDG16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), offering a critical lens on how international law can evolve to promote equitable and transparent global governance. With contributions ranging from analysis of historical perspectives to examination of contemporary implications, the edited volume shall be essential for readers interested in international law and scholars established in the research field of international criminal law, international humanitarian law and human rights, fair global order and the evolving role of dissent, inclusivity, cultural and social contextualisation.

This volume provides a nuanced analysis of the profound impact left by the dissenting opinion in the Tokyo Trial by Justice Radha Binod Pal's&nbsp;ideological stance on modern international criminal law. It consists of a detailed examination of this bold opinion on post-war justice that built the legacy of Justice Radha Binod Pal. Through an interdisciplinary perspective, this collection analyses the contemporary impact of Justice Pal's dissent and his ideologies and how they can impact contemporary dialogue in international law revolving around fairness, justice, accountability and inclusivity in international law and global power dynamics. It explores the intersection of his critique with contemporary concerns such as the decolonisation of international law, the legitimacy of global legal institutions, and the pursuit of a just world order. By engaging with issues such as territorial conflicts, and the role of legal pluralism, this volume aligns with the broader objectives of SDG16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), offering a critical lens on how international law can evolve to promote equitable and transparent global governance. With contributions ranging from analysis of historical perspectives to examination of contemporary implications, the edited volume shall be essential for readers interested in international law and scholars established in the research field of international criminal law, international humanitarian law and human rights, fair global order and the evolving role of dissent, inclusivity, cultural and social contextualisation.

Justice Radha Binod Pal's Dissent

Beyond Victor’s Justice and Pursuit of Sustainable Development in International Law

This book investigates the structural limits of the principle of party initiative and the rule of congruence within the contemporary civil procedural system, with a primary focus on Brazilian law and a comparative outlook that resonates with other legal traditions. It critically examines how the liberal-individualist foundations of civil procedure—rooted in 18th- and 19th-century private law—continue to shape the concepts of jurisdiction, action, defense, and process, often in ways that are misaligned with the collective and complex nature of modern legal disputes.Through the lens of financial compensation for mineral exploitation, the work explores the dual role of the Public Power as both rights-holder and representative of diffuse interests, revealing the inadequacy of traditional procedural categories in addressing collective claims. This tension underscores the need to rethink the procedural framework, especially when the judiciary is called upon to act beyond the strict confines of party-submitted claims.The book proposes a shift toward a more systemic and public-oriented understanding of judicial activity, grounded in the principle of proportionality—understood here in its pan-procedural dimension. Rather than evaluating procedural guarantees solely within the boundaries of individual cases, it advocates for a broader analysis that considers the efficiency and legitimacy of the judiciary as a public service. Drawing on constitutional principles and comparative jurisprudence, it argues that judicial decisions must be guided by a balance between means and ends, ensuring that interventions are not only legally sound but also socially and economically justified.This approach is further developed through a critical analysis of the classification of legal actions and the effects of judicial decisions. The book revisits traditional distinctions—declaratory, constitutive, condemnatory, mandamental, and executive—highlighting their historical evolution and practical limitations. It challenges the rigidity of these categories, especially in contexts such as third-party embargoes and fraud against creditors, where procedural formalism can hinder effective legal protection. The discussion extends to the controversial admissibility of declaratory actions on facts, advocating for a more pragmatic and flexible interpretation that aligns with the realities of legal uncertainty and the need for judicial affirmation of rights and obligations.This work offers a renewed theoretical and practical framework for understanding the boundaries of judicial action. By integrating the principles of proportionality and adequate representation into the heart of procedural reasoning, it seeks to reconcile the individualistic origins of civil procedure with the demands of a complex, pluralistic, and constitutionally committed legal order.

Principle of Party Initiative

Ferdinand von Schirach

Weitere Titel zum Thema