<div class="raw-html-embed"> <a href="https://staempflirecht.ch/schweizerische-zivilprozessordnung-art-1352-zpo-sowie-art-400408-zpo/ean-9783727222108">
 Jetzt bestellen
</a>
: Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (Art. 1–352 ZPO sowie Art. 400–408 ZPO)</div>

Über uns

À propos de nous

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Karriere

Carrière

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Impressum

Mentions légales

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Datenbanken

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Autorenstimmen

Témoignages

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Partner

Partenaires

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Unsere Funktionen

Nos fonctions

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Gesamtkatalog

Catalogue complet

Nicole Moreham: The Protection of
Privacy in English Private Law

The Protection of Privacy in English Private Law

Do free speech rights apply against private actors?

Free Speech Theory challenges contemporary thought on this issue. It champions free speech not for its contribution to epistemic advance or informed democratic participation, but as a product of individuality, located in a system of freedom from state control. This has wide-ranging implications for rights-claims directed against private actors concerning online, workplace, and public-interest based forms of speech.

This innovative, rigorously researched, and comprehensive restatement of free speech principle is both topical and important. It has significance for policy makers, practitioners, and commentators around the world.

Provides a radical reappraisal of the right to free speech by critiquing pre-existing theory and offers a novel reinterpretation of the right as a matter of theory and practice.

A Radical Restatement

Free Speech Theory

From the popular creator of @LawByMike, a hilarious guide to all your legal questions—from the obscure to the downright absurd.&nbsp; Could you be arrested if you let your kids have a few sips of wine with dinner? Is it illegal to lie on your dating profile? Can a python be an emotional support animal? Most people don’t know the majority of our country’s laws, so they don’t know how to avoid breaking them, what their actual rights are, or when they can seek legal recourse. Lawyer Mike Mandell is here to change that, by answering your most burning legal questions ... and some you didn’t even know you had! Oops... That's Illegal! is a book of legal insight from a practicing lawyer who’s seen it all. Using the same light-heartedness and humor that made his social account @LawByMike so popular, Mandell covers a wide range of topics from police encounters (Is it illegal to do a U-turn at a DUI checkpoint?) to party fouls (What’s the penalty for streaking?) to legal disputes (Can I sue my own lawyer for doing a bad job?). Funny, informative, and sprinkled with little-known legal facts throughout, Oops... That's Illegal! is sure to help even the most upstanding citizens when they come face-to-face with their next legal dilemma.

A Handbook for the Wildly Curious (and the Accidental Outlaw)

Oops…That’s Illegal!

Noch nie gab es so viele Ermittlungen wegen bloßer Worte, egal ob es um Migration, Klimapolitik, die Ukraine oder den Nahostkonflikt geht. Der Staat definiert heute etliche politische Aussagen als strafbar, die noch vor zehn Jahren ganz klar unter die Meinungsfreiheit fielen.Grenzen der MeinungsfreiheitRonen Steinke zeigt auf, wo neuerdings die Grenzen der Meinungsfreiheit verlaufen, auch im digitalen Raum. Gerade in der gegenwärtigen Lage, so kritisiert der preisgekrönte Journalist und Jurist, sollte das Land mehr Meinungsfreiheit wagen, anstatt zu glauben, man überzeuge Menschen, indem man ihnen den Mund verbietet.Wer bestimmt, was als 'Hass und Hetze' gilt?Wegen des Satzes 'Impfen macht frei' kann man neuerdings schon bestraft werden, aber 'Deutschland den Deutschen, Ausländer raus' in der Disco zu grölen, ist erlaubt. 'Gaza = Auschwitz' ist eine Straftat, doch die Aussage, der Bundeskanzler sei ein 'Volksschädling', ist erlaubt. Zu sagen, die CSU hetze gegen die Grünen, als seien diese die 'neuen Juden', ist eine Straftat, aber die Vertreibung aller Palästinenser aus dem Gazastreifen zu fordern, ist erlaubt. Wer kennt sich da noch aus?Heutzutage wird es oft Gerichten überlassen zu entscheiden, welche Meinungsäußerungen strafbar sind und welche nicht. Ein engagiertes Plädoyer für mehr Transparenz und ein dringender Appell, mehr Meinungsfreiheit zu wagen, das heißt Debatten in der Zivilgesellschaft zuzulassen, solange sie gewaltfrei bleiben.

Noch nie gab es so viele Ermittlungen wegen bloßer Worte, egal ob es um Migration, Klimapolitik, die Ukraine oder den Nahostkonflikt geht. Der Staat definiert heute etliche politische Aussagen als strafbar, die noch vor zehn Jahren ganz klar unter die Meinungsfreiheit fielen.Grenzen der MeinungsfreiheitRonen Steinke zeigt auf, wo neuerdings die Grenzen der Meinungsfreiheit verlaufen, auch im digitalen Raum. Gerade in der gegenwärtigen Lage, so kritisiert der preisgekrönte Journalist und Jurist, sollte das Land mehr Meinungsfreiheit wagen, anstatt zu glauben, man überzeuge Menschen, indem man ihnen den Mund verbietet.Wer bestimmt, was als »Hass und Hetze« gilt?Wegen des Satzes »Impfen macht frei« kann man neuerdings schon bestraft werden, aber »Deutschland den Deutschen, Ausländer raus« in der Disco zu grölen, ist erlaubt. »Gaza = Auschwitz« ist eine Straftat, doch die Aussage, der Bundeskanzler sei ein »Volksschädling«, ist erlaubt. Zu sagen, die CSU hetze gegen die Grünen, als seien diese die »neuen Juden«, ist eine Straftat, aber die Vertreibung aller Palästinenser aus dem Gazastreifen zu fordern, ist erlaubt. Wer kennt sich da noch aus?Heutzutage wird es oft Gerichten überlassen zu entscheiden, welche Meinungsäußerungen strafbar sind und welche nicht. Ein engagiertes Plädoyer für mehr Transparenz und ein dringender Appell, mehr Meinungsfreiheit zu wagen, das heißt Debatten in der Zivilgesellschaft zuzulassen, solange sie gewaltfrei bleiben.

Wie Polizei und Justiz unser Grundrecht einschränken – und wie wir es verteidigen | Aktuelles Sachbuch in Zeiten von Hass und Hetze

Meinungsfreiheit

In 1964 the Supreme Court radically altered its interpretation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In the famed libel case, New York Times v. Sullivan, the Court ruled that public officials claiming to be victims of defamation would be held to a higher standard than ordinary citizens. They must prove not only that they were victims of defamatory falsehood, but also that their defamers acted with "actual malice" knowledge that their claim was false, or at least a reckless disregard for its truth or falsity. As a result of this ruling, newspapers cannot now be easily held liable for false defamatory statements about politicians, celebrities, or other public figures. Though many have heralded Sullivan as a landmark ruling in defense of First Amendment freedoms, in No Liberty to Libel, Carson Holloway argues that the Supreme Court erred dangerously in its interpretation of the Constitution. Holloway contends that the Court should revisit and reject the Sullivan doctrine. Holloway demonstrates that the Sullivan doctrine's two-tier system of libel law--with one standard for ordinary persons and another for the prominent--has no roots in the original understanding of the freedom of the press, or in the tradition of American law that prevailed for most of our history. This tradition held more simply and consistently that libel was an exercise not of liberty but of license, and hence outside the scope of the freedom of the press. A Supreme Court committed to interpreting the Constitution faithfully--that is, according to its text, original meaning, and historical understanding-- must reject New York Times v. Sullivan as a product of judicial policymaking untethered to the real meaning of the First Amendment.

The Constitutional Case Against New York Times V. Sullivan

No Liberty to Libel

Internet und Gesellschaft

The present volume addresses key issues of digitisation and internationalisation from the perspective of public law, European law and international law in seven contributions. They were written as part of a lecture series held by the Faculty of Law at the University of Innsbruck during the 2024/25 academic year. The contributions analyse and discuss current challenges arising from digitalisation in the mobility sector and in administrative procedures. In addition, the authors examine European and international regulation of cyberspace, online communication, media services, and artificial intelligence.

Perspektiven der Internationalisierung und Digitalisierung

Recht der Digitalisierung III

This book analyzes the legal tensions that exist in the economy that purports to "reanimate" the dead using postmortem digital technologies. Technological reanimation has proven to be big business, with many notable commercial entities investing in this "afterlife economy". Postmortem technologies convincingly replicate the appearance, physiognomy, conversation styles, and thought patterns of a deceased individual by generating digital copies that act in their stead. In the entertainment industry, new works can be created with dead celebrities through a postmortem copy that is managed by their representatives. The result is an economy in which the dead are offered as a product or service to consumers, with some having their artistic legacies extended past death through an "afterlife career". Many stakeholders stand to benefit from such a lucrative afterlife economy, but the law is simply not prepared for the issues that will arise with this exploitation of the dead. Reanimation requires the exploitation of one's reputation, persona, artistic works, and personal data. However, the corresponding legal protections are either nonexistent, inapplicable, or inconsistent across borders - depending on which posthumous interest is analyzed. In response, and by studying the contours of the existing legal protections in the afterlife economy, this book proposes a system rooted in the "shared ownership" of one's postmortem copy and the responsible "stewardship" of legacies through fiduciary duties.Law and the Digital Reanimation of the Dead will be of considerable interest to scholars working in the areas of entertainment law, intellectual property, and law and technology, as well as others with professional interests in the area.

A Regulatory Framework for the Afterlife Economy

Law and the Digital Reanimation of the Dead

Routledge Research in Sport and Corruption

This book presents a rigorous interdisciplinary examination of the evolving relationships between sport, betting, and crime - now widely regarded as the most significant threat to the integrity and sustainability of modern sport. It provides a critical framework for understanding how these forces interact in an increasingly globalised and digitally mediated sporting and sport betting ecosystem.Despite being routinely described as the greatest threat to contemporary sport, competition manipulation remains poorly defined, and successive institutional and political attempts to clarify the phenomenon have failed to achieve conceptual precision and practical coherence. Too often, it is argued, efforts to promote and protect sport integrity have been reduced to the prevention of sport betting fraud. This book is the first monograph to interrogate a broad range of real-world integrity conflicts arising where sport converges with global online betting markets. Combining economic, philosophical, and political analysis, it develops a comprehensive account of the structural, ethical, and policy challenges defining this new sport-integrity-betting ecosystem.The book is written for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners working in sports ethics, sports management, criminology, sport governance, sport sociology, and political science related with sport issues, as well as those in the betting and regulatory sectors seeking a deeper conceptual understanding of contemporary sport integrity threats.

From Problem to Policy Implementation

Sport Integrity, Betting and Crime

This book tackles the most pressing problems of contemporary free speech law by examining where the idea of free expression came from in the first place, applying the lessons of the past to address the challenges of the present.

Free speech cannot be taken for granted - it needs to be fought for. But its champions will be successful only if they understand what they are defending. For free speech is a deceptively simple principle.

How should it guide us on the bounds of what is acceptable to say? Should we be free to preach hatred, or to spread fear or fake news? Can media freedom be balanced against the right to privacy? How does free speech work online? Can the internet be made a safe space without compromising freedom of expression?

On the Law of Speaking Freely offers not just insights but answers to these and other such vital questions by roaming widely over the law of free speech, from English common law to the European Convention on Human Rights via the US First Amendment.

In rescuing free speech from the culture wars in which it has become embroiled, Adam Tomkins restates its values, its complexities and its enduring importance, in prose that is as passionate as it is clear-sighted. Even-handed, informed and authoritative, this is a major, timely work from one of the UK's leading constitutional scholars.

Tackles the problems of contemporary free speech law by applying the lessons of the past to address the challenges of the present.

On the Law of Speaking Freely

Routledge Research in Human Rights Law

This book argues that the state can, and indeed has a duty to, regulate the phenomenon of political disinformation in a holistic manner, while both preserving and safeguarding freedom of expression, in particular by providing for a suitable combination of correction and sanction mechanisms.

Safeguarding Freedom of Expression In Europe

Political Disinformation and the Law

Object Lessons

Object Lessons is a series of short, beautifully designed books about the hidden lives of ordinary things. Over the span of a single decade, VHS technology changed the relationship between privacy and entertainment, pried open the closed societies behind the Iron Curtain, and then sank back into oblivion. Its meteoric rise and fall encapsulated the dynamics of the '80s and foreshadowed the seismic cultural shifts to come after the Cold War. In the West, its advent deepened the trends of the age: individualism, consumerism, the fragmentation of society, and the consolidation of corporate power in the entertainment industry and its victory over the regulatory powers of the state. In the East, it encouraged new forms of socialization and economic exchanges, while announcing the gradual crumbling of government control over the imagination of the people. By the mid-1990s, the VHS format was displaced by the DVD. The DVD would eventually give way to streaming. Yet the cultural legacy of the videotape continues to inform our relationship to technology, privacy, and to entertainment.

Videotape

An essential introduction to the complexities of visual representation, this book offers a critical new framework for understanding and practicing photojournalism in a global digital context.

Contemporary Ethics and Practices

Critical Photojournalism

"In one wide-ranging volume, Lambert and the country reporters demonstrate that law can not only keep up with technological change, but can in fact stay well ahead by anticipating upcoming questions. This comprehensive comparative reference will be invaluable for lawyers and students." (Professor Joshua Fairfield. Washington and Lee University School of Law, Review of a previous edition) Bringing together a global team of authors, the International Handbook of Social Media Laws covers the law relating to social media across 34 countries in total. From influential social media defamation cases in Australia, to tweeting from court, and regulations enforced by the UK's Online Safety Act 2023, this book clearly articulates the main legal issues and developments across various legal jurisdictions, to ensure a company's social media presence is fully compliant with the law of each country. The third edition has been fully updated to incorporate new criminal and civil case law, and covers topics including: - Online abuse, online bullying and cyberbullying laws - Laws or rules specific to children and social media - Bans or restrictions on the use of, or access to, the internet or social media, including the influential TikTok, Inc. v. Garland case in the US - Use of social media as evidence in courts - Hacking and data breach laws. Contributors to the volume each provide coverage of their own country, ensuring the volume is both authoritative and practical. Countries represented include: Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Senegal, Serbia, Singapore, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States and Uruguay. This title is included in Bloomsbury Professional's Intellectual Property and IT online service.

International Handbook of Social Media Laws

The Protection of Privacy in English Private Law

Weitere Titel zum Thema