<div class="raw-html-embed"> Kennen Sie schon unseren Geschäftskundenservice? <a href="/fuer-geschaeftskunden">Wir beraten Sie gerne</a>.</div>

NL_Doormat: Hintergrundfarbe des Newsletter Banners unten in der Doormat. Mit # eingeben z.B. #1405BE

NL_Doormat: Verlinkung zur Newsletter Seite

Über uns

À propos de nous

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Karriere

Carrière

Impressum

Mentions légales

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Datenbanken

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Autorenstimmen

Témoignages

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Partner

Partenaires

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Sortiment und Funktionen

Assortiment et recherche

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Argumentation Library

Marraud H: Argument Dialectics: The
Place of Reasons in Logic

Argument Dialectics: The Place of Reasons in Logic

Revisiting Medieval Dialectics

The Pragmatics of Straw Man Fallacies: An Experimental Approach

This book presents a comprehensive picture of when the premises of an argument are adequately connected to its conclusion. The author draws upon the familiar Toulmin model, Rescher’s discussion of presumption and burden of proof, and L. Jonathan Cohen’s presentation of the method of relevant variables.The book first assesses the warrant or inference rule connecting the premises to the conclusion. To analyzes this, the author asks a series of questions such as - should the warrant be evaluated by conclusive or defeasible standards? Does the argument require that its premises, if acceptable, guarantee that the conclusion is acceptable also or does it allow the premises just to present a body of relevant evidence? Is the inference rule backed or supported a priori or a posteriori? These distinctions form four categories of warrants: conclusive a priori, defeasible a posteriori, defeasible a priori, and virtually conclusive a posteriori. The warrants in each category are evaluated differently for how strongly the premises support the conclusion of arguments instancing those warrants. After presenting the rationale for this division and discussing our nonprobabilistic approach, the author analyzes the connection adequacy for each of these types of warrants. This book is of interest to scholars of argumentation theory.

Assessing Argument Ground Adequacy

Adequate Connections

This volume comprises a selection of contributions to the theorizing about argumentation that have been presented at the 9th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), held in Amsterdam in July 2018.&nbsp;The&nbsp; chapters included provide a general theoretical perspective on central topics in argumentation theory, such as argument schemes and the fallacies. Some contributions concentrate on the treatment of the concept of conductive argument. Other contributions are dedicated to specific issues such as the justification of questions, the occurrence of mining relations, the role of exclamatives, argumentative abduction, eudaimonistic argumentation and a typology of logical ways to counter an argument. In a number of cases the theoretical problems addressed are related to a specific type of context, such as the burden of proof in philosophical argumentation, the charge of committing a genetic fallacy in strategic manoeuvring in philosophy,the necessity of community argument, and connection adequacy for arguments with institutional warrants.The volume offers a great deal of diversity in its breadth of coverage of argumentation theory and wide geographic representation from North and South America to Europe and China.

This volume comprises a selection of contributions to the theorizing about argumentation that have been presented at the 9th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), held in Amsterdam in July 2018.&nbsp;The&nbsp; chapters included provide a general theoretical perspective on central topics in argumentation theory, such as argument schemes and the fallacies. Some contributions concentrate on the treatment of the concept of conductive argument. Other contributions are dedicated to specific issues such as the justification of questions, the occurrence of mining relations, the role of exclamatives, argumentative abduction, eudaimonistic argumentation and a typology of logical ways to counter an argument. In a number of cases the theoretical problems addressed are related to a specific type of context, such as the burden of proof in philosophical argumentation, the charge of committing a genetic fallacy in strategic manoeuvring in philosophy,the necessity of community argument, and connection adequacy for arguments with institutional warrants.The volume offers a great deal of diversity in its breadth of coverage of argumentation theory and wide geographic representation from North and South America to Europe and China.

A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory

From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild

This volume focuses on the role language plays at all levels of the argumentation process. It explores the effects that specific linguistic choices may have in the production and the reception of arguments and in doing so, it moves beyond the first, necessary, descriptive stance provided by current literature on the topic. Each chapter provides an original take illuminating one or more of the following three issues: the range of linguistic resources language users draw on as they argue; how cognitive processes of meaning construction may influence argumentative practices; and which discursive devices can be used to fulfil a number of argumentative goals. The volume includes theoretical and empirical or applied stances, providing the reader both with state-of-the-art reflections on the relationship between argumentation and language, and with concrete examples of how this relationship plays out in naturally occurring argumentative practices, such as classroom interaction, and political,parliamentary or journalistic discourse.  This is a very original, timely and welcome contribution to the study of argumentation conducted with the tools of the language sciences. The collection of papers relevantly tackles key linguistic, discursive and cognitive aspects of argumentative practices whose treatment is underrepresented in mainstream argumentation studies by offering new and exciting linguistically-grounded theoretical accounts. As such, the volume testifies both to the vigour of the linguistic current within the discipline and to the high standards of scholarly commitment and quality that the younger generation is pushing forward. Without question, this book marks an important milestone in the relationships between linguistics and argumentation theory.

This volume focuses on the role language plays at all levels of the argumentation process. It explores the effects that specific linguistic choices may have in the production and the reception of arguments and in doing so, it moves beyond the first, necessary, descriptive stance provided by current literature on the topic. Each chapter provides an original take illuminating one or more of the following three issues: the range of linguistic resources language users draw on as they argue; how cognitive processes of meaning construction may influence argumentative practices; and which discursive devices can be used to fulfil a number of argumentative goals. The volume includes theoretical and empirical or applied stances, providing the reader both with state-of-the-art reflections on the relationship between argumentation and language, and with concrete examples of how this relationship plays out in naturally occurring argumentative practices, such as classroom interaction, and political, parliamentary or journalistic discourse. This is a very original, timely and welcome contribution to the study of argumentation conducted with the tools of the language sciences. The collection of papers relevantly tackles key linguistic, discursive and cognitive aspects of argumentative practices whose treatment is underrepresented in mainstream argumentation studies by offering new and exciting linguistically-grounded theoretical accounts. As such, the volume testifies both to the vigour of the linguistic current within the discipline and to the high standards of scholarly commitment and quality that the younger generation is pushing forward. Without question, this book marks an important milestone in the relationships between linguistics and argumentation theory.Christian Plantin, Professor Emeritus

Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations

This book addresses two related questions that have first arisen in Toulmin’s seminal book on the uses of argument. The first question is the one of the relationship between the semantic analysis of modality and the structure of arguments. The second question is the one of the distinctive place, or role, of modality in the fundamental structure of arguments. These two questions concern how modality, as a semantic category, relates to the fundamental structure of arguments. The book addresses modality and argumentation also according to another perspective by looking at how different linguistic modal expressions may be taken as argumentative indicators. It explores the role of modal expressions as argumentative indicators by using the Italian modal system as a case study. At the same time, it uses predictions/forecasts in the business-financial daily press to investigate the relation between modality and the context of argumentation.

A Semantic Investigation of the Role of Modalities in the Structure of Arguments with an Application to Italian Modal Expressions

Modality in Argumentation

The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang together.The following crucial topics are discussed: (1) argumentation theory as a discipline; (2) the meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics; (3) the model of a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion; (4) fallacies as violations of a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse; (5) descriptive research of argumentative reality; (6) analysis as theoretically-motivated reconstruction; (7) strategic manoeuvring aimed at combining achieving effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness; (8) the conventionalization of argumentative practices; (9) prototypical argumentative patterns; (10) pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches.Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective&nbsp;is clearly written and makes argumentation theory understandable to all scholars and advanced students interested in argumentation research.

The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang together.The following crucial topics are discussed: (1) argumentation theory as a discipline; (2) the meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics; (3) the model of a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion; (4) fallacies as violations of a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse; (5) descriptive research of argumentative reality; (6) analysis as theoretically-motivated reconstruction; (7) strategic manoeuvring aimed at combining achieving effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness; (8) the conventionalization of argumentative practices; (9) prototypical argumentative patterns; (10) pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches.Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective is clearly written and makes argumentation theory understandable to all scholars and advanced students interested in argumentation research.

Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

This book brings together in one place David Hitchcock’s most significant published articles on reasoning and argument. In seven new chapters he updates his thinking in the light of subsequent scholarship. Collectively, the papers articulate a distinctive position in the philosophy of argumentation.
 
 Among other things, the author:•	develops an account of “material consequence” that permits evaluation of 	inferences without problematic postulation of unstated premises.•	updates his recursive definition of argument that accommodates chaining and 	embedding of arguments and allows any type of illocutionary act to be a 	conclusion.&nbsp;•	advances a general theory of relevance.•	provides comprehensive frameworks for evaluating inferences in reasoning by 	analogy, means-end reasoning, and appeals to considerations or criteria.•	argues that none of the forms of arguing ad hominem is a fallacy.•	describes proven methods of teaching critical thinking effectively.

This book brings together in one place David Hitchcock’s most significant published articles on reasoning and argument. In seven new chapters he updates his thinking in the light of subsequent scholarship. Collectively, the papers articulate a distinctive position in the philosophy of argumentation.
 
 Among other things, the author:•	develops an account of “material consequence” that permits evaluation of inferences without problematic postulation of unstated premises.•	updates his recursive definition of argument that accommodates chaining and embedding of arguments and allows any type of illocutionary act to be a conclusion.&nbsp;•	advances a general theory of relevance.•	provides comprehensive frameworks for evaluating inferences in reasoning by analogy, means-end reasoning, and appeals to considerations or criteria.•	argues that none of the forms of arguing ad hominem is a fallacy.•	describes proven methods of teaching critical thinking effectively.

Essays in Informal Logic and on Critical Thinking

On Reasoning and Argument

This book presents reflections on the relationship between narratives and argumentative discourse. It focuses on their functional and structural similarities or dissimilarities, and offers diverse perspectives and conceptual tools for analyzing the narratives’ potential power for justification, explanation and persuasion. Divided into two sections, the first Part, under the title “Narratives as Sources of Knowledge and Argument”, includes five chapters addressing rather general, theoretical and characteristically philosophical issues related to the argumentative analysis and understanding of narratives. We may perceive here how scholars in Argumentation Theory have recently approached certain topics that have a close connection with mainstream discussions in epistemology and the cognitive sciences about the justificatory potential of narratives. The second Part, entitled “Argumentative Narratives in Context”, brings us six more chapters that concentrate on either particular functions played by argumentatively-oriented narratives or particular practices that may benefit from the use of special kinds of narratives. Here the focus is either on the detailed analysis of contextualized examples of narratives with argumentative qualities or on the careful understanding of the particular demands of certain well-defined situated activities, as diverse as scientific theorizing or war policing, that may be satisfied by certain uses of narrative discourse.

Narration as Argument

The present volume assembles a relevant set of studies of argument by analogy, which address this topic in a systematic fashion, either from an essentially theoretical perspective, or from the perspective of it being applied to different fields like politics, linguistics, literature, law, medicine, science in general, and philosophy. All result from original research conducted by their authors for this publication. Thus, broadly speaking, this is an exception which we find worthy of occupying a special place in the sphere of the bibliography on the argument by analogy. In effect, most of the contexts of the publications on this topic focus on specific areas, for example everyday discourse, science or law theory, while underestimating or sometimes even ignoring other interdisciplinary scopes, as is the case of literature, medicine or philosophy. The idiosyncrasy of this volume is that the reader and the researcher may follow the development of different theoretical outlooks on argument by analogy, while measuring the scope of its (greater or lesser) application to the aforementioned areas as a whole.

The present volume assembles a relevant set of studies of argument by analogy, which address this topic in a systematic fashion, either from an essentially theoretical perspective or from the perspective of it being applied to different fields like politics, linguistics, literature, law, medicine, science in general and philosophy. All result from original research conducted by their authors for this publication. Thus, broadly speaking, this is an exception which we find worthy of occupying a special place in the sphere of the bibliography on the argument by analogy. In effect, most of the contexts of the publications on this topic focus on specific areas, for example everyday discourse, science or law theory, while underestimating or sometimes even ignoring other interdisciplinary scopes, as is the case of literature, medicine or philosophy. The idiosyncrasy of this volume is that the reader and the researcher may follow the development of different theoretical outlooks on argument by analogy, while measuring the scope of its (greater or lesser) application to the aforementioned areas as a whole.

Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy

Gegenwartsliteratur

Motive, Widersprüche und Ambivalenzen des heutigen Mannseins: Entdeckungen im literarischen Werk Karl Ove Knausgårds.

Über Karl Ove Knausgård

Männlichkeit und Existenz

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

22nd European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2025, Portoroz, Slovenia, June 1–5, 2025, Proceedings, Part II

The Semantic Web

Hartnäckig hält sich das Gerücht, die ältere Kritische Theorie habe zu internationaler Politik nichts zu sagen. Doch hat man vielleicht bisher nur nicht ausreichend genau hingesehen? Tatsächlich, so zeigt Moritz Rudolphs bahnbrechende Studie, fügt sie den Theorien internationaler Politik hinzu, was diesen fehlt, ohne es zu wissen: eine Dialektik von Einheit und Zerfall. In den zahlreichen verstreuten Bemerkungen zur internationalen Politik, die das Spätwerk von Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Franz L. Neumann und Herbert Marcuse durchziehen, findet Rudolph das Material zu ihrer Rekonstruktion. Angesichts der zur Diktatur erstarrten kommunistischen Revolution und des nationalsozialistischen Zivilisationsbruchs ist ihr Aussgangspunkt nicht die Fortschrittserwartung, sondern eine pessimistische Geschichtsphilosophie des Abschwungs: In der älteren Kritischen Theorie finden wir dann die Konturen eines Denkens, das im Welteinigungsfortschritt auch den zivilisatorischen Rückschritt vermutet, eine trostlos verwaltete Weltgemeinschaft heraufziehen sieht und die Eskalation der Feindschaft befürchtet - falls die Gelegenheit zum wirklichen Bruch nicht ergriffen wird. Die Konsequenzen, die sich daraus für die vier im Zentrum des Buchs stehenden Denker ergeben, sind ganz unterschiedliche - und führen in ihrem politischen Realismus doch immer direkt in unsere so globalisierte wie zugleich unsicher gewordene Gegenwart.

Hartnäckig hält sich das Gerücht, die ältere Kritische Theorie habe zu internationaler Politik nichts zu sagen. Doch hat man vielleicht bisher nur nicht ausreichend genau hingesehen? Tatsächlich, so zeigt Moritz Rudolphs bahnbrechende Studie, fügt sie den Theorien internationaler Politik hinzu, was diesen fehlt, ohne es zu wissen: eine Dialektik von Einheit und Zerfall. In den zahlreichen verstreuten Bemerkungen zur internationalen Politik, die das Spätwerk von Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Franz L. Neumann und Herbert Marcuse durchziehen, findet Rudolph das Material zu ihrer Rekonstruktion. Angesichts der zur Diktatur erstarrten kommunistischen Revolution und des nationalsozialistischen Zivilisationsbruchs ist ihr Aussgangspunkt nicht die Fortschrittserwartung, sondern eine pessimistische Geschichtsphilosophie des Abschwungs: In der älteren Kritischen Theorie finden wir dann die Konturen eines Denkens, das im Welteinigungsfortschritt auch den zivilisatorischen Rückschritt vermutet, eine trostlos verwaltete Weltgemeinschaft heraufziehen sieht und die Eskalation der Feindschaft befürchtet – falls die Gelegenheit zum wirklichen Bruch nicht ergriffen wird. Die Konsequenzen, die sich daraus für die vier im Zentrum des Buchs stehenden Denker ergeben, sind ganz unterschiedliche – und führen in ihrem politischen Realismus doch immer direkt in unsere so globalisierte wie zugleich unsicher gewordene Gegenwart.

Internationale Politik in der älteren Kritischen Theorie

Einheit und Zerfall

Der niederländische Theologe Oepke Noordmans (1871-1956) ist einer der einflussreichsten evangelischen Theologen des 20. Jahrhunderts. Sein systematisches Hauptwerk «Herschepping» («Neuschöpfung», 1934) ist ein Klassiker niederländischer Theologie - auch wenn er es selbst nur als «Dogmatikchen» bezeichent hat. Noordmans entwirft darin Leitlinien für die christliche Predigt und für das Glaubensgespräch. Entstanden unter der Bedrohung totalitärer Ideologien in den 1930er-Jahren, verstand sich das bahnbrechende Werk als Gegenmittel gegen deren zerstörerischen Geist.
Leitender Gedanke von «Neuschöpfung» ist, dass die Heilige Schrift Anrede ist. Dafür entwickelt Noordmans einen kritischen Begriff von Schöpfung: «Kritisch» bedeutet, dass die Dinge nicht so genommen werden, wie sie sind, sondern wie sie in Gottes Welt beabsichtigt sind. Verfasst für die Arbeit in den Gemeinden ist Oepke Noordmans' Hauptwerk fast 100 Jahre nach Erscheinen erstmals auf Deutsch greifbar.

Kurze dogmatische Anleitung für religiöse Ansprachen und Gespräche

Neuschöpfung

This book examines Richard Whately's classic book Historic Doubts Relative to Napoleon Buonaparte. After considering its textual development, the analysis focusses on Whately's idea of the ‘Preliminary Question’; the idea that in the debate about Jesus’s miracles there is a more basic question that has been overlooked and which invalidates the debate. It is asked whether the notion of a Preliminary Question might not illuminate other philosophical disputes. Finally, a variant of the Preliminary Question is proposed in which both positions in a dispute are shown to be true and this form of the question is invoked to shed light on the debate between metaphysical monists and dualists and to revisit the debate about miracles.This book is essential reading for all scholars of the philosophy of religion and British 19th century philosophy. It is also of interest to scholars researching David Hume and Bertrand Russell.David Berman is Fellow Emeritus of Philosophy at Trinity College Dublin. He has published more than 90 peer-reviewed articles and 6 scholarly books.

This book examines Richard Whately's classic book 
 Historic Doubts Relative to Napoleon Buonaparte
 . After considering its textual development, the analysis focusses on Whately's idea of the ‘Preliminary Question’; the idea that in the debate about Jesus’s miracles there is a more basic question that has been overlooked and which invalidates the debate. It is asked whether the notion of a Preliminary Question might not illuminate other philosophical disputes. Finally, a variant of the Preliminary Question is proposed in which both positions in a dispute are shown to be true and this form of the question is invoked to shed light on the debate between metaphysical monists and dualists and to revisit the debate about miracles.
 This book is essential reading for all scholars of the philosophy of religion and British 19th century philosophy. It is also of interest to scholars researching David Hume and Bertrand Russell.

Whately's Historic Doubts about Napoleon's Existence and the Preliminary Question

This book constitutes the proceedings of the 50th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, SOFSEM 2025, held in Bratislava, Slovak Republic, during January 20-23, 2025. 
<div>The 48 full papers presented in this book were carefully reviewed and selected from 109 submissions. They include original research from all areas of foundations of computer science and artificial intelligence focusing on AI-based algorithms and techniques, nature-inspired computing, machine learning theory, multi-agent algorithms and games, neural network theory, parallel and distributed computing, quantum computing, computability, decidability, classical and non-classical models of computation, computational complexity, computational learning, cryptographic techniques and security, data compression, data and pattern mining methods, discrete combinatorial optimization, automata, languages, machine models, rewriting systems, efficient data structures, graph structure and algorithms, logics of computation, robotics, and other relevant theory topics in computing and AI.</div>

This book constitutes the proceedings of the 50th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, SOFSEM 2025, held in Bratislava, Slovak Republic, during January 20-23, 2025.&nbsp;
The 48 full papers presented in this book were carefully reviewed and selected from 109 submissions. They include original research from all areas of foundations of computer science and artificial intelligence focusing on AI-based algorithms and techniques, nature-inspired computing, machine learning theory, multi-agent algorithms and games, neural network theory, parallel and distributed computing, quantum computing, computability, decidability, classical and non-classical models of computation, computational complexity, computational learning, cryptographic techniques and security, data compression, data and pattern mining methods, discrete combinatorial optimization, automata, languages, machine models, rewriting systems, efficient data structures, graph structure and algorithms, logics of computation, robotics, and other relevant theory topics in computing and AI.

50th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, SOFSEM 2025, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, January 20–23, 2025, Proceedings, Part II

SOFSEM 2025: Theory and Practice of Computer Science

Trends in Logic

This book presents established and new research on the close connections between graph games and systems of logic, particularly existing and newly designed modal logics. The volume utilizes two graph games – the sabotage game and the hide-and-seek game – to demonstrate the natural interplay between designing new graph games and exploring new kinds of logics that fit with these games. The collected works in this volume therefore straddle both established research directions of designing logics for analyzing games and designing games for analyzing logics.This book contains a general introduction to the project of matching up graph games and logic design, and a collection of selected and commissioned contributions that illustrate novel concepts, questions, and logical techniques in the field. The contributions are introduced and contextualized in an editorial preface and conclusion. Future outlooks towards further research on graph games, new graph games, major new technical challenges, and potential practical applications to, for example, board games and a design tool for experiments in cognitive psychology conclude the volume. This book is of interest to a broad audience working with theoretical and practical applications of graph games and modal logics.

Recent Developments and Further Directions

Graph Games and Logic Design

50th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, SOFSEM 2025, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, January 20–23, 2025, Proceedings, Part I

Für alle, die das Christentum noch nicht abgeschrieben habenHäufig schon hat der Philosoph Slavoj Žižek die&nbsp;christliche Theologie kommentiert und kritisiert, aber bislang eher verstreut über sein ganzes Werk. Jetzt legt er die erste buchfüllende Darstellung seines theologischen Projekts vor. Unter Rückgriff auf so unterschiedliche Traditionen und Themen wie buddhistisches Denken, dialektischer Materialismus, politische Subjektivität, Quantenphysik, künstliche Intelligenz artikuliert dieses Buch Žižeks Vorstellung von einem religiösen Leben. Er fragt u.a., ob Gott an sich selbst glaubt, ob man Gott täuschen kann, er versteht den Heiligen Geist als Modell einer emanzipatorischen Gemeinschaft und untersucht den Buddhismus im Unterschied zum Christentum. Doch Žižek wäre nicht Žižek, wenn er dabei nicht auf seine Lieblingsthemen zu sprechen käme: Cancel Culture, Geschlechtsidentitäten, Chatbots, Perversionen, Klassenkampf, Law and Order. Oder in seinen eigenen Worten: »Um ein wahrer dialektischer Materialist zu werden, muss man durch die christliche Erfahrung hindurchgehen.«»Ein klassischer Žižek«, wie die Zeitschrift Jacobin geschrieben hat.

Wie man ein wahrer Materialist wird

Christlicher Atheismus

History of Analytic Philosophy

Bertrand Russell, Feminism, and Women Philosophers in his Circle

From the Logic of Questions to Proof Theory

The Method of Socratic Proofs

Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics

The aim of this text is to introduce discrete mathematics to beginning students of mathematics or computer science. It does this by bringing some coherency into the seemingly incongruent subjects that compose discrete math, such as logic, set theory, algebra, and combinatorics. It emphasizes their theoretical foundations and illustrates proofs along the way. The book prepares readers for the analysis of algorithms by discussing asymptotic analysis and a discrete calculus for sums. The book also deduces combinatorial methods from the foundations that are laid out. Unlike other texts on this subject, there is a greater emphasis on foundational material that leads to a better understanding. To further assist the reader in grasping and practicing concepts, roughly 690 exercises are provided at various levels of difficulty. Readers are encouraged to study the examples in the text and solve as many of the exercises as possible.The text is intended for freshman or sophomore undergraduate students in mathematics, computer science, or similar majors. The assumed background is precalculus. The chapter dependency chart included is designed to help students, independent readers, and instructors follow a systematic path for learning and teaching the material, with the option to explore material in later chapters.

Discrete Structures

Argument Dialectics: The Place of Reasons in Logic

Bibliografische Angaben

Schlagworte

Bibliografische Angaben

Schlagworte

Weitere Titel der Reihe: Argumentation Library

Weitere Titel zum Thema