<div class="raw-html-embed"><a href="https://staempflirecht.ch/studium">JUS-Studium? Das Fachwissen von Expertinnen und Experten des Schweizer Rechts – griffbereit!</a></div>

Über uns

À propos de nous

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Karriere

Carrière

Aboverträge Kündigen

Résiliation d’abonnement

Vertrag widerrufen

Résiliation de contrat 

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Impressum

Mentions légales

Barrierefreiheit

Accessibilité

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

Libra

Was ist Libra?

C'est quoi Libra ?

Kostenlos testen

Tester gratuitement

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Aktienrecht

Droit des sociétés anonymes

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Digitales Angebot

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Swisslex

Dienstleistungen

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Open Access Policy

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Partner

Partenaires

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Unsere Funktionen

Nos fonctions

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Gesamtkatalog

Catalogue complet

Fachkatalog Recht

Catalogue de droit

Wirtschaftsrecht international

Franz Kaps

Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit in Singapur und Indien

Zum Werk
Der Schiedsstandort Deutschland steht im internationalen Wettbewerb. Ein wichtiger Wettbewerbsfaktor sind die staatlichen Gerichte, die die Schiedsgerichte unterstützen und kontrollieren: Sind sie schiedsfreundlich, neutral und schnell? Das Werk, das alle deutschen Gerichtsentscheidungen zur Aufhebung und Vollstreckbarerklärung von Schiedssprüchen aus fünf Jahren auswertet, gibt erstmals belastbare Antworten auf diese Fragen.
Gleichzeitig bringt dieses Werk Licht ins Dunkel der Schiedslandschaft. Solches Wissen ist schon wegen der Vertraulichkeit von Schiedsverfahren meist nicht verfügbar. Das Werk macht belastbare Angaben dazu, wie sich die Erscheinungsformen der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit voneinander unterscheiden, wer sich der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit bedient, vor welchen Schiedsgerichten, in welchen Branchen, in welchen Rechtsgebieten und mit welchen Streitwerten Schiedsverfahren tatsächlich geführt werden.
Schließlich zeigt das Werk, wie deutsche Gerichte Schiedssprüche überprüfen. Es stellt erstmals empirisch abgesichert dar, inwieweit sich die von den einzelnen Gerichten überprüften Schiedssprüche voneinander unterscheiden und ob es nennenswerte Unterschiede in der Rechtsprechung der Schiedssenate gibt.
Das Werk bietet eine fundierte Analyse der aktuellen Schiedspraxis in Deutschland, unterstreicht die Leistungsfähigkeit und Attraktivität des Schiedsstandortes Deutschland und zeigt, was Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit in Deutschland ausmacht. Auch für die anwaltliche Beratung sind diese tatsachengestützten Einschätzungen unverzichtbar.

Vorteile auf einen BlickDarstellung der aktuellen Schiedspraxis in DeutschlandAuswertung aller deutschen Gerichtsentscheidungen, die Schiedssprüche überprüfen, über fünf Jahre
Zielgruppe
Für Richterschaft, Rechtsanwaltschaft, Notariate, Studierende, Unternehmen, Verbände, Vereine, Schiedsinstitutionen, Industrie- und Handelskammern.

Zum Werk 
 Der Schiedsstandort Deutschland steht im internationalen Wettbewerb. Ein wichtiger Wettbewerbsfaktor sind die staatlichen Gerichte, die die Schiedsgerichte unterstützen und kontrollieren: Sind sie schiedsfreundlich, neutral und schnell? Das Werk, das alle deutschen Gerichtsentscheidungen zur Aufhebung und Vollstreckbarerklärung von Schiedssprüchen aus fünf Jahren auswertet, gibt erstmals belastbare Antworten auf diese Fragen.
 
 Gleichzeitig bringt dieses Werk Licht ins Dunkel der Schiedslandschaft. Solches Wissen ist schon wegen der Vertraulichkeit von Schiedsverfahren meist nicht verfügbar. Das Werk macht belastbare Angaben dazu, wie sich die Erscheinungsformen der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit voneinander unterscheiden, wer sich der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit bedient, vor welchen Schiedsgerichten, in welchen Branchen, in welchen Rechtsgebieten und mit welchen Streitwerten Schiedsverfahren tatsächlich geführt werden.
 
 Schließlich zeigt das Werk, wie deutsche Gerichte Schiedssprüche überprüfen. Es stellt erstmals empirisch abgesichert dar, inwieweit sich die von den einzelnen Gerichten überprüften Schiedssprüche voneinander unterscheiden und ob es nennenswerte Unterschiede in der Rechtsprechung der Schiedssenate gibt.
 
 Das Werk bietet eine fundierte Analyse der aktuellen Schiedspraxis in Deutschland, unterstreicht die Leistungsfähigkeit und Attraktivität des Schiedsstandortes Deutschland und zeigt, was Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit in Deutschland ausmacht. Auch für die anwaltliche Beratung sind diese tatsachengestützten Einschätzungen unverzichtbar.
 Vorteile auf einen Blick<ul><li>Darstellung der aktuellen Schiedspraxis in Deutschland</li><li>Auswertung aller deutschen Gerichtsentscheidungen, die Schiedssprüche überprüfen, über fünf Jahre</li></ul> Zielgruppe 
 Für Richterschaft, Rechtsanwaltschaft, Notariate, Studierende, Unternehmen, Verbände, Vereine, Schiedsinstitutionen, Industrie- und Handelskammern.

Eine Erhebung zur Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und zur Spruchpraxis der Gerichte

Schiedsstandort Deutschland

Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice

The contemporary significance of the subject “Social Rights, Inequalities and Affirmative Action” is indisputable. In periods of social polarization, conflict and crisis, it is imperative that the obligation of our societies to protect and promote social rights is addressed and acknowledged. It is also necessary to recognize the way in which social rights are jeopardized by inequalities that impede the cultivation of robust social relationships and to document instances of the implementation of affirmative actions in this scenario. The aims of this work are as follows: firstly, to establish general topics (part I); secondly, to undertake more specific investigations within the primary topic (part II); and thirdly, to address the challenges posed by the technological transition currently taking place in society, which has significant consequences for social rights, (in)equality, and affirmative action (part III). The study is organized into three sections corresponding to these targets. For the purposes of this study, the analysis will commence, in the Part I of this book, at the genesis of the debates, as outlined in the chapter concerning the old and the new forms of racism. This contribution is followed by a chapter on the growing recognition of intersectional discrimination in European and global human rights frameworks and by another on structural discrimination and the function of the law against unjust enrichment. To further explore and expand upon the subjects addressed in the preceding chapters, the final chapter of Part I of this book delves into the topic of affirmative action in the United States. The second part of this work is dedicated primarily to specific forms of affirmative action, thereby deepening the discussion initiated in the first part of this book. The initial topic examines the way in which the pandemic has impacted specific social groups and led to the emergence of health disparities in the UK. The subsequent chapter is devoted to an examination of the alterations in the benefits of minimum income support in Brazil in recent years. The fourth chapter undertakes a detailed investigation of a specific affirmative action program for children and adolescents with the objective of reducing violence in urban areas. The final chapter conducts an analysis of ageing, public policies and inclusion in Brazil. The third and final section is dedicated to an examination of the challenges faced by our technological societies. The field of “Social Rights, Inequalities and Affirmative Action” is set to be impacted by the regulation of artificial intelligence, the increasing digitalization of activities, and the development of new tools designed to enhance the efficiency of the social state. The initial chapter of the concluding section deals with the regulation of artificial intelligence in Brazil and the impacts of neurotechnology. The second study examines conservative digitalization and structural inequalities in Latin American information societies, while the final study focuses on the emergence of the social digital state and the use of instruments that produce inequality and discrimination.

The contemporary significance of the subject “Social Rights, Inequalities and Affirmative Action” is indisputable. In periods of social polarization, conflict and crisis, it is imperative that the obligation of our societies to protect and promote social rights is addressed and acknowledged. It is also necessary to recognize the way in which social rights are jeopardized by inequalities that impede the cultivation of robust social relationships and to document instances of the implementation of affirmative actions in this scenario. The aims of this work are as follows: firstly, to establish general topics (part I); secondly, to undertake more specific investigations within the primary topic (part II); and thirdly, to address the challenges posed by the technological transition currently taking place in society, which has significant consequences for social rights, (in)equality, and affirmative action (part III). The study is organized into three sections corresponding to these targets. For the purposes of this study, the analysis will commence, in the Part I of this book, at the genesis of the debates, as outlined in the chapter concerning the old and the new forms of racism. This contribution is followed by a chapter on the growing recognition of intersectional discrimination in European and global human rights frameworks and by another on structural discrimination and the function of the law against unjust enrichment. To further explore and expand upon the subjects addressed in the preceding chapters, the final chapter of Part I of this book delves into the topic of affirmative action in the United States. The second part of this work is dedicated primarily to specific forms of affirmative action, thereby deepening the discussion initiated in the first part of this book. The initial topic examines the way in which the pandemic has impacted specific social groups and led to the emergence of health disparities in the UK. The subsequent chapter is devoted to an examination of the alterations in the benefits of minimum income support in Brazil in recent years. The fourth chapter undertakes a detailed investigation of a specific affirmative action program for children and adolescents with the objective of reducing violence in urban areas. The final chapter conducts an analysis of ageing, public policies and inclusion in Brazil. The third and final section is dedicated to an examination of the challenges faced by our technological societies. The field of “Social Rights, Inequalities and Affirmative Action” is set to be impacted by the regulation of artificial intelligence, the increasing digitalization of activities, and the development of new tools designed to enhance the efficiency of the social state. The initial chapter of the concluding section deals with the regulation of artificial intelligence in Brazil and the impacts of neurotechnology. The second study examines conservative digitalization and structural inequalities in Latin American information societies, while the final study focuses on the emergence of the social digital state and the use of instruments that produce inequality and discrimination.

Social Rights, Inequalities and Affirmative Action

This book offers a comprehensive reconstruction of proportionality in constitutional law, tracing its trajectory from its origins in Prussian administrative law and German constitutional adjudication to its contemporary application across diverse legal systems. Against the conventional approaches that equate proportionality with the weighing of competing values, it argues that this test was originally conceived as a dogmatic instrument for the protection of rights, not as a balancing technique. Through a detailed comparative analysis of the German and Brazilian experiences, the book reconstructs how proportionality gradually shifted from a strict limit on state power to an open formula of judicial discretion, and proposes a coherent model to restore its normative function. The book critically re-examines the philosophical and theoretical assumptions that transformed proportionality into an indeterminate balancing exercise and reconstructs it as a structured dogmatic test defined by constitutional parameters of protection. Engaging with authors such as Robert Alexy, Bernhard Schlink and Ralf Poscher, it maps how proportionality became the dominant method of constitutional adjudication and how that dominance produced both methodological uncertainty and jurisprudential uniformity. Finally, it proposes a theoretical framework that distinguishes proportionality in the singular, as a general abstraction, from proportionalities in the plural, calibrated to the specificities of each right, context and mode of judicial review. This plural and context-sensitive approach restores the analytical precision that contemporary constitutional law often lacks. By combining historical analysis, comparative dogmatics and legal theory, the study contributes to current debates on the legitimacy and limits of judicial review, the boundaries of fundamental rights and the crisis of constitutional interpretation in modern democracies.

Origins, Models, and Dogmatic Reconstruction

Proportionality in Constitutional Law

Rechtstheorie - Legal Theory

RTh (Mohr Siebeck)

Global value chains exist in the blind spots of legal doctrine and are hence marked by a diffusion of responsibility. For private law, this entails a methodological challenge that is exemplary for dealing with globalisation - that is, to apprehend global value chains in both their economic and societal dynamics.

Zur sozialen Aufgabe des Rechts der Globalisierung

Rechtsverfassung globaler Produktion

Charting the Future of Private Law in Aotearoa New Zealand and Beyond

Scholars of Commercial Law

China Arbitration Yearbook

This series of book includes the latest cases, materials and commentaries concerning arbitration from Supreme People's Court of PRC and other courts, the main arbitration institutions and the leading experts in China.

Apart from introducing cases and material of main and recent development of arbitration in China, this series may also include reports or commentaries by experts. By offering guidance on what to do and how to proceed in practical scenarios, this book serves as a resource for the arbitration community, particularly for those involved in cases related to China. The exploration of practical applications and theoretical advancements will be especially appealing to practitioners and scholars in the field.

The book meets the needs of the practitioners, arbitrators or academics who are interested in China arbitration. For the practitioners, it will benefit them in each stage of arbitration. For arbitrators, knowing the opinions, defenses and decisions will help them to handle the arbitration more effectively and successfully. For academics, the series of book is also an excellent source of analysis on China arbitration and all relevant judicial practice. Alongside this, for the business community and legal consultants, before doing business or providing legal consultation, they may need to know more about arbitration as alternative to litigation in China.

This series of book includes the latest cases, materials and commentaries concerning arbitration from Supreme People's Court of PRC and other courts, the main arbitration institutions and the leading experts in China.Apart from introducing cases and material of main and recent development of arbitration in China, this series may also include reports or commentaries by experts. By offering guidance on what to do and how to proceed in practical scenarios, this book serves as a resource for the arbitration community, particularly for those involved in cases related to China. The exploration of practical applications and theoretical advancements will be especially appealing to practitioners and scholars in the field.The book meets the needs of the practitioners, arbitrators or academics who are interested in China arbitration. For the practitioners, it will benefit them in each stage of arbitration. For arbitrators, knowing the opinions, defenses and decisions will help them to handle the arbitration more effectively and successfully. For academics, the series of book is also an excellent source of analysis on China arbitration and all relevant judicial practice. Alongside this, for the business community and legal consultants, before doing business or providing legal consultation, they may need to know more about arbitration as alternative to litigation in China.

China Arbitration Yearbook (2024)

This book offers a groundbreaking perspective on the use of documentary evidence in legal proceedings.
 
 In its first part, the book presents a critical overview of the current state of legal scholarship and jurisprudence concerning documentary evidence. It argues that, particularly in civil law jurisdictions, the law often rests on two flawed assumptions: that documents are sensory equivalents and that they are objective, with self-evident meaning that requires no interpretation or intersubjective validation. The result, in the author's view, is a legal culture that treats documentary evidence as a kind of objective "gold standard," obscuring the subjectivity and interpretive work that actually goes into creating and evaluating such evidence.
 
 The second part draws on general epistemology and semiotics to challenge these assumptions. It explores the role of context, the differences between human testimony and machine-generated evidence, and the need for comprehensive evidentiary sets. Through a semiotic lens, it examines various types of signs and the processes of representation and interpretation that underlie each type of documentary evidence.
 
 Building on these theoretical foundations, the third part proposes a new framework for understanding documentary evidence. It emphasizes the need for understanding the “physiological” functioning of each type of document and considers factors such as the nature of the sign, potential pathological or physiological alterations, and whether the source is human or mechanical.
 
 Finally, offers both theoretical insights and practical recommendations for all actors involved in the admission, production, and evaluation of documentary evidence—judges, lawyers, prosecutors, and others—providing tools for a more critical, contextual, and accurate approach to legal proof.

Writings, Recordings, Photographs and Beyond

Documentary Evidence

Qizhen Humanities and Social Sciences Library

This seminal work establishes the digital rule of law as the fundamental trajectory for social governance and legal transformation in the digital era. Guided by the vision of "empowering the rule of law through digital technologies while anchoring digital development within legal frameworks," the Digital Law Research Team at Zhejiang University presents pioneering research in this book.

Practice and Reform

Digital Rule of Law

This landmark collection provides new insights, concepts and techniques to understand and respond to tort claims based on illegal conduct. It is the first comparative study of this difficult field, which has remained contested despite numerous decisions of the highest courts in the common law world. The collection draws on scholars from common law and civilian jurisdictions spanning Argentina, Australia, Brazil, England and Wales, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Scotland, Singapore, Spain, South Africa and Sweden. Together they set out fact patterns, and justifications for tort liability to illustrate the coherence and unity that exists when courts address such claims. While common law legal systems have developed a specific defence of illegality for some of those fact patterns, civilian jurisdictions tend to see illegality operating, if at all, through the existing components of tort liability. The book explains how these different approaches have been reached, how they work, and what they reveal about reasoning in tort.

Comparative Lessons on Legal Reasoning

Understanding Tort Claims and Illegality

Selected Chinese Cases on the CISG

Selected Chinese Cases on the UN Sales Convention (CISG) Vol. 4

¿This book provides a comparative perspective on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on different criminal law systems. To this end, the book brings together country reports from Brazil, Argentina, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Austria, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, France and Belgium.
All country reports address the same key issues in order to facilitate comparative conclusions. Those key issues re: criminal liability for spreading the coronavirus, criminal liability of medical staff in triage situations, criminal liability of political decision-makers, as well as further (country-specific) challenges in the context of the pandemic and criminal law. Furthermore, they explore domestic case-law and academic literature relevant in this context.This book will be useful for criminal law scholars and practitioners as well as policymakers around the world. The comparative approach of the book will provide them with a more informed and objective perception of their national systems and their respective approaches to COVID-19 and criminal law. Another key objective of this volume in the ICJ Series is to foster dialogue and an exchange of ideas between stakeholders of different nations and ultimately to enable cross-semination between different criminal law systems.Prof. Dr. Frank Zimmermann is Professor for Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, European and International Criminal Law as well as Criminal Law and Digitalization at the Institute for Criminal Sciences, Dept. V, University of Münster in Münster, Germany.

Comparative Perspectives

Criminal Law and the Covid-19 Crisis

Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit in Singapur und Indien

Weitere Titel zum Thema