<div class="raw-html-embed"> Kennen Sie schon unseren Geschäftskundenservice? <a href="/fuer-geschaeftskunden">Wir beraten Sie gerne</a>.</div>

NL_Doormat: Hintergrundfarbe des Newsletter Banners unten in der Doormat. Mit # eingeben z.B. #1405BE

NL_Doormat: Verlinkung zur Newsletter Seite

Über uns

À propos de nous

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Karriere

Carrière

Impressum

Mentions légales

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Datenbanken

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Autorenstimmen

Témoignages

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Partner

Partenaires

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Sortiment und Funktionen

Assortiment et recherche

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Handbuch der kommunalen Wissenschaft und
Praxis

Handbuch der kommunalen Wissenschaft und Praxis

Band 3: Kommunale (Fach-)Aufgaben und Instrumente der Aufgabenerfüllung

"Explores how courts engage with questions of fact in public law adjudication, the role of evidence, and the procedures by which these facts are established"--

This book explores critical issues about how courts engage with questions of fact in public law adjudication. 

Although the topic of judicial review — the mechanism through which individuals can challenge governmental action — continues to generate sustained interest amongst constitutional and administrative lawyers, there has been little attention given to questions of fact. This is so despite such determinations of fact often being hugely important to the outcomes and impacts of public law adjudication. 

The book brings together scholars from across the common law world to identify and explore contested issues, common challenges, and gaps in understanding. The various chapters consider where facts arise in constitutional and administrative law proceedings, the role of the courts, and the types of evidence that might assist courts in determining legal issues that are underpinned by complex and contested social or policy questions. The book also considers whether the existing laws and practices surrounding evidence are sufficient, and how other disciplines might assist the courts. 

The book reconnects the key practical issues surrounding evidence and facts with the lively academic debate on judicial review in the common law world; it therefore contributes to an emerging area of scholarly debate and also has practical implications for the conduct of litigation and government policy-making.

Facts in Public Law Adjudication

You Can't Do That

Submitted Assignment from the year 2024 in the subject Law - Public Law / Administrative Law, grade: 1st, , course: Postgraduate Diploma in Public Law, language: English, abstract: The separation of powers is one of the most fundamental doctrines in constitutional law. It's there to ensure that the three branches of government provide the necessary checks and balances, thereby ensuring that the executive is held to account. James Corbett's discussion around this doctrine aims to uncover not only how these three branches keep a check on the state but why this is so important. There is much focus on the role of the judiciary as one of the three branches and at how it keeps the government in check. It was not so long ago that the courts were headed by the government as one source of power but now, in recent years since it's been made independent of government this in itself shows just how far the constitution has adjusted itself so that it can uphold this separation and keep all governments to account. To deny this separation would mean replacing it with an ultimate source of power, which, if it was ever allowed to exist once more, would only be to deny democracy. Political institutions are, therefore, in place to make sure that a separation exists and that the government is properly held to account in a democratic state 

James Michael Corbett

An examination into the checks and balances institutions play in the UK Constitution

An Analysis into the functions of political institutions in Public Law

Hart Studies on Judging and the Courts

This book presents an empirical analysis of the UK Supreme Court's output over its first ten years, with a specific focus on each individual judge's contribution to each case. It shows that judges, like all of us, are human; it would be difficult to imagine that any of us, even in our most professional capacity, could act completely independently of our predilections, motivations and biases. The same is true for the judges sitting on the UK's highest court.

Drawing on insights from a bespoke dataset of judgments, this work discerns trends and tendencies across each judge's voting patterns and the reasoning they adopt when disposing of cases. It not only highlights areas of divergence, but also shows how each of the judges tended to vote in different contexts, including which were more likely to overturn appeals from lower courts, side with certain parties such as the state or underdogs, and find liability in various areas (tort, contract, criminal, EU, immigration and tax law, with a special focus on human rights cases). Another section illustrates the differences between the judges when it comes to judicial reasoning, such as their approach to precedent and preferred methods of statutory interpretation. 

This work shows that different judges exercise their power in different ways. Some are more comfortable with pushing boundaries whilst others are more restrained. Some grant the state a lot of leeway whilst others apply heavy scrutiny. Some are, as Lord Denning suggested, "bold spirits" whilst others are 'timorous souls'. It shows, at least when it comes to the Supreme Court, that it matters who our judges are.

This book presents an empirical analysis of the UK Supreme Court’s output over its first ten years, with a specific focus on each individual judge’s contribution to each case. It shows that judges, like all of us, are human; it would be difficult to imagine that any of us, even in our most professional capacity, could act completely independently of our predilections, motivations and biases. The same is true for the judges sitting on the UK’s highest court.

Drawing on insights from a bespoke dataset of judgments, this work discerns trends and tendencies across each judge’s voting patterns and the reasoning they adopt when disposing of cases. It not only highlights areas of divergence, but also shows how each of the judges tended to vote in different contexts, including which were more likely to overturn appeals from lower courts, side with certain parties such as the state or underdogs, and find liability in various areas (tort, contract, criminal, EU, immigration and tax law, with a special focus on human rights cases). Another section illustrates the differences between the judges when it comes to judicial reasoning, such as their approach to precedent and preferred methods of statutory interpretation. 

This work shows that different judges exercise their power in different ways. Some are more comfortable with pushing boundaries whilst others are more restrained. Some grant the state a lot of leeway whilst others apply heavy scrutiny. Some are, as Lord Denning suggested, ‘bold spirits’ whilst others are ‘timorous souls’. It shows, at least when it comes to the Supreme Court, that it matters who our judges are.

Judicial Individuality on the UK Supreme Court

Hart Studies in Constitutional Law

This book articulates and defends a sceptical general account of parliamentary sovereignty.

It challenges the orthodox approach to this fundamental doctrine by making three key heretical claims. First, there are some laws that Parliament cannot make. Second, there are several ways in which primary legislation can be overridden or set aside by institutions other than Parliament. And third, Parliament has the power to bind itself as to the substance of future legislation. All three positions are developed using arguments which depend on existing legal materials and are compatible with the normative underpinnings of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. 

The book combines theoretical and doctrinal analysis. The theoretical part of the book situates Parliament's authority to legislate in the broader context of an examination of constitutional and political authority. It develops a conception of the ways in which competing views on the scope of Parliament's legislative authority are mediated into law. The doctrinal part of the book reconsiders Parliament's legal position. It proposes a novel conception of Parliament's power to bind itself, rooted in the idea of commitments. It defends the existence of a judicial power to impose narrowly conceived freestanding limits on Parliament's law-making authority, rooted in the rule of law. Finally, the book examines the challenges posed to parliamentary sovereignty by both its internal procedures and the devolved legislatures.

This book articulates and defends a sceptical general account of parliamentary sovereignty.

It challenges the orthodox approach to this fundamental doctrine by making three key heretical claims. First, there are some laws that Parliament cannot make. Second, there are several ways in which primary legislation can be overridden or set aside by institutions other than Parliament. And third, Parliament has the power to bind itself as to the substance of future legislation. All three positions are developed using arguments which depend on existing legal materials and are compatible with the normative underpinnings of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. 

The book combines theoretical and doctrinal analysis. The theoretical part of the book situates Parliament’s authority to legislate in the broader context of an examination of constitutional and political authority. It develops a conception of the ways in which competing views on the scope of Parliament’s legislative authority are mediated into law. The doctrinal part of the book reconsiders Parliament’s legal position. It proposes a novel conception of Parliament’s power to bind itself, rooted in the idea of commitments. It defends the existence of a judicial power to impose narrowly conceived freestanding limits on Parliament’s law-making authority, rooted in the rule of law. Finally, the book examines the challenges posed to parliamentary sovereignty by the executive, Parliament’s internal procedures and the devolved legislatures.

A Sceptical Restatement

Parliamentary Sovereignty

The MIBI Agreements and the Law

Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy

""This book offers a deeper reflection on intolerance in politics and society today. It explains why the representation and visibility of minorities has historically been contested, and why constitutional law is so important to protect them today. Examples come from across the liberal-illiberal divide: France, the Netherlands, Hungary, and Poland. ""--

Constitutional Intolerance offers a deeper reflection on intolerance in politics and society today, explaining why minorities face the contestation of their public visibility, and how the law could protect them. Van der Tol refers to historical practices of toleration, distilling from it the category of 'the other' to the political community, whose presence, representation, and visibility is not self-evident and is often subject to regulation. The book considers 'the other' in the context of modern constitutions, with reference to (ethno)religious, ethnic, and sexual groups. Theoretical chapters engage questions about the time and temporality of otherness, and their ambivalent relationship with (public) space. It offers examples from across the liberal-illiberal divide: France, the Netherlands, Hungary, and Poland. It highlights that vulnerability towards intolerance is inscribed in the structures of the law, and is not merely inherent to either liberalism or illiberalism, as is often inferred.

The Fashioning of the Other in Europe's Constitutional Repertoires

Constitutional Intolerance

Schriften zum Stiftungs- und Gemeinnützigkeitsrecht

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span lang="DE" style="font-size: 11.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'PT Sans';"&gt;In diesem Buch wird die Grundsatzentscheidung zur Vereinsklassenabgrenzung (Kita-Rechtsprechung) des II.&amp;nbsp;Zivilsenats des BGH zum Anlass genommen, die Grenze des zul&amp;auml;ssigen wirtschaftlichen Gesch&amp;auml;ftsbetriebs von Idealvereinen neu zu definieren. Ein besonderes Augenmerk gilt der durch die Rechtsprechung statuierten Indizwirkung des Gemeinn&amp;uuml;tzigkeitsrechts f&amp;uuml;r die Eintragungsf&amp;auml;higkeit des Vereins.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

Alina Morain

Der Verein als privatrechtlicher Zweckverband

Handbuch der gefährlichen Güter

Hommel,G.(Hg):Hdb gefährl.Güter (Bände)

Anhand des sogenannten "Gefahrendiamanten", eines Symbols, das sich auf jedem Merkblatt findet, ist es möglich, einen schnellen, groben Überblick über die Feuergefahr, Gesundheitsgefahr und die Reaktionsgefahr eines jeden gelisteten Stoffes zu erhalten. Ferner ist anhand eines Symbols erkennbar, ob der Stoff in gefährlicher Weise mit Wasser reagiert. Anhand des&nbsp;Hazchem-Codes&nbsp;ist schnell und einfach erkennbar, welche Schutzstufe bei der Schutzbekleidung notwendig ist und ob der Stoff eher eingedeicht oder verdünnt werden sollte.

Farblich unterteilt findet man auf dem Stoffmerkblatt in roter Farbe die Hinweise für die&nbsp;Brandbekämpfung. In blauer Farbe findet man Hinweise für den behandelnden (Not-) Arzt.

Für alle Gefahrgüter, die im Hommel enthalten sind, wurden die GHS-Kennzeichnungen mit aufgenommen: Signalworte, Piktogramme, sowie die neuen Gefahrenhinweise (H-Statements) und Sicherheitshinweise (P-Statements).

Ursprünglich wurde das Werk zur Verwendung bei der&nbsp;Wasserschutzpolizei&nbsp;erstellt. Inzwischen gehört es jedoch zur Standardbeladung der&nbsp;Gerätewagen Gefahrgut (GW-G)&nbsp;der&nbsp;Feuerwehren.

Die Merkblätter sind als Loseblattsammlung sowie auf Datenträger lieferbar. Das Gesamtwerk wird laufend aktualisiert.

Handbuch der gefährlichen Güter. Band 7: Merkblätter 2503-2900

This book considers whether Parliament recognises a constitutional right to property. Parliament is supreme: in theory, there is nothing to stop it from passing laws to confiscate property. Nevertheless, MPs often argue that a proposed law would be unconstitutional. What does this mean in a system without a written constitution? What counts as a sound argument about constitutional rights? And what influence do constitutional arguments have on the legislative process? The book takes a close look at these questions. It reviews legislation and debates from the Middle Ages through to more recent legislation, and covers a wide range of topics, such as land reform, nationalisation, taxation, regulatory laws and retrospection. It also looks at the most recent debates and considers the relevance of constitutional thinking to election manifestos of the main political parties.

Parliament, the Constitution, and Property in the United Kingdom

In diesem Buch wird die Grundsatzentscheidung zur Vereinsklassenabgrenzung (Kita-Rechtsprechung) des II.&nbsp;Zivilsenats des BGH zum Anlass genommen, die Grenze des zulässigen wirtschaftlichen Geschäftsbetriebs von Idealvereinen neu zu definieren. Ein besonderes Augenmerk gilt der durch die Rechtsprechung statuierten Indizwirkung des Gemeinnützigkeitsrechts für die Eintragungsfähigkeit des Vereins.Die Autorin&nbsp;Alina Morain studierte Rechtswissenschaft an der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg. Sie war wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Lehrstuhl für deutsches und europäisches Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht der Universität Heidelberg. 2024 schloss sie das Referendariat am Landgericht Heidelberg ab und promovierte 2025.

In diesem Buch wird die Grundsatzentscheidung zur Vereinsklassenabgrenzung (Kita-Rechtsprechung) des II.&nbsp;Zivilsenats des BGH zum Anlass genommen, die Grenze des zulässigen wirtschaftlichen Geschäftsbetriebs von Idealvereinen neu zu definieren. Ein besonderes Augenmerk gilt der durch die Rechtsprechung statuierten Indizwirkung des Gemeinnützigkeitsrechts für die Eintragungsfähigkeit des Vereins.

Handbuch der kommunalen Wissenschaft und Praxis

Bibliografische Angaben

Schlagworte

Bibliografische Angaben

Schlagworte

Weitere Titel zum Thema