<div class="raw-html-embed"><a href="https://libratech.ai/ch/?utm_source=partner&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_campaign=wkch_libra_prsp_staempfli_07_2026
">Stämpfli - L’innovation technologique au service de la littérature juridique - Testez gratuitement !</a></div>

Über uns

À propos de nous

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Karriere

Carrière

Aboverträge Kündigen

Résiliation d’abonnement

Vertrag widerrufen

Résiliation de contrat 

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Impressum

Mentions légales

Barrierefreiheit

Accessibilité

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

Libra

Was ist Libra?

C'est quoi Libra ?

Kostenlos testen

Tester gratuitement

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Aktienrecht

Droit des sociétés anonymes

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Digitales Angebot

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Swisslex

Dienstleistungen

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Open Access Policy

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Partner

Partenaires

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Unsere Funktionen

Nos fonctions

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Gesamtkatalog

Catalogue complet

Fachkatalog Recht

Catalogue de droit

Audrius Razma

Privacy, Government Surveillance, and Business Intelligence. A Comparative Legal Study of the Netherlands and Belgium

The law codes in the Middle East North Africa (MENA) region are a well-crafted blend of civil and Islamic law in which civil law principles do not violate Islamic provisions. Yet, common law principles derived either from English common law or Islamic customary usages remain unidentified and thus ignored. Here, this complex scenario is rectified through a comparative analysis of the primary data (e.g. cases, statutes and arbitral award decisions), adding common law and uncodified Islamic custom to MENA law codes. The purpose of this comparative analysis is to allow common legal principles found in civil, common and Islamic law to be distilled in order to create a new, harmonised international commercial arbitration law code (HICALC) or uniform Arab arbitration law (UAAL) for adoption in the MENA region, where these principles already greatly influence the legal systems and can be readily assimilated into a harmonised or uniform code. The work demonstrates that this new code would lead to improved arbitral award enforcement in the MENA.

A Model Harmonised International Arbitration Law Code for the Middle East and North Africa

Company law, as a specialised branch of business law, is uniquely shaped by contemporary challenges that often redefine traditional legal concepts. Historically, the study of company law has been approached through the lens of individual legal systems rather than a broader, comparative perspective. Addressing this gap, this advanced textbook offers a comprehensive comparative analysis of common law and civil law traditions.The book focuses on the interplay between the UK legal system and the European Union's legal framework through the analysis of some EU states' legal systems. It examines company law in common law jurisdictions, particularly England and Wales, alongside Scotland, while integrating the latest legislative developments within some states of the EU, for instance, Italy and Germany. Through this comparative lens, the textbook explores pressing contemporary issues, such as the pursuit of sustainability and the green agenda, and technological evolution, in particular, AI, analysing their impact on the foundational principles of company law.Marking the 20th anniversary of the passing of the Companies Act 2006, Comparative Company Law serves as a bridge between common law and civil law, combining tradition with innovation. It provides a nuanced exploration of how modern challenges, ranging from sustainability to human rights, reshape the structure of company law, making it an essential resource for advanced students and scholars.

Human Rights, Sustainability and Technological Advancements

Comparative Company Law

This book is a comparative study of how courts and oversight bodies review lawmaking processes, exposing democratic deficits and advocating for transparent, participatory legislative reform across Europe. In an era of fast-track legislation and executive overreach, the democratic legitimacy of lawmaking is under increasing pressure. This timely and original volume offers the first comprehensive, comparative analysis of how judicial and non-judicial bodies monitor and assess legislative procedures across Europe and beyond. Drawing on examples from Hungary, France, and the United States, the book highlights troubling trends - such as the use of expedited processes, exclusion of opposition voices, and lack of public participation - that undermine democratic principles and good governance. Contributors examine how courts, parliamentary committees, and international organisations like the Venice Commission respond to these challenges, offering insights into their capacity to uphold constitutional standards and human rights protections. The book also explores the broader implications of defective lawmaking for the rule of law, separation of powers, and the achievement of global goals such as the UN's Sustainable Development Agenda. Featuring leading scholars and practitioners from across Europe, including underrepresented jurisdictions, the volume bridges theory and practice, offering a rich interdisciplinary perspective. It is essential reading for academics, legal professionals, policymakers, and civil society actors concerned with the integrity of democratic institutions and the future of legislative governance. By shedding light on the mechanisms of procedural review, this book makes a compelling case for more transparent, inclusive, and accountable lawmaking in democratic societies.

European Perspectives on the Procedural Review of Parliamentary Lawmaking

Landmark Cases

This book presents the landmark cases in company law which have shaped and defined the field and is written by leading experts in the field.

Landmark Cases in Company Law

The book examines the practice of judicial reasoning in Tort law, understood as a process of justification, consisting of both deductive and non-deductive elements, and therefore involving a significant element of choice or discretion. The book divides the elements of judicial reasoning into four conceptual categories: factual assessments, application of legislative and judge-made rules, reliance on reasonableness, and policy considerations. To discuss these elements in a comparative perspective the book uses the English and French judicial traditions of Tort law as case studies. This enables the author to present a range of methods of establishing facts, drawing inferences, using legal sources and relying on policy arguments. By closely examining selected Tort judgments from both jurisdictions, the book elucidates the phenomenon of law-making through adjudication in both a non-codified and a codified system of liability. It offers a reflection on different approaches legal systems may adopt to the importance in the process of judicial justification of such issues as certainty and truth, common sense, consistency with previous judicial decisions and policy.
The book connects the choice of approaches in judicial reasoning in Tort law with its procedural and institutional context.

English and French Traditions Compared

Judicial Reasoning in Tort Law

Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law

Drawing on the experience of recognised experts from across a range of different fields and jurisdictions, this landmark publication tackles default rules in private law in comparative perspective. Often underestimated, but highly influential, default rules are non-mandatory rules that kick in where nothing else has been agreed or provided. The contributions explore default rules from a variety of angles relevant to both scholarship and legal practice, including: · behavioural aspects and the role of platform terms in the digital age; · the remit and operation of defaults in different areas, ranging from contract and commercial law to succession, civil procedure and private international law; · a comparison between Common law and Civilian approaches as well as the EU level; · the perspectives of different 'players' engaged in the generation and application of default rules.

Default Rules in Private Law

Constitutional Systems of the World

A Contextual Analysis

The Constitutional System of Turkey

Oñati International Series in Law and Society

This book brings together theoretical and empirical research, as well as interdisciplinary and comparative studies with the aim to direct the contemporary debates within the field of ombud scholarship. Most countries have public ombud institutions that are supposed to function as mechanisms of dispute resolution outside courts for citizens seeking redress for complaints against public bodies. While research on these oversight bodies has long focused on legal aspects, since the last decade scholars have increasingly become interested in historical, political and social aspects. This book makes a contribution in this multi-disciplinary field by filling two key gaps in the literature: the first part showcases recent empirical research, the second part covers critical analytical approaches. Taken together, this volume promotes a social science oriented understanding of ombud institutions as embedded in specific social contexts, which are formed by societal forces while also contributing to the shaping of modern societies. Critical examination of how and under which conditions ombuds operate enables us to identify blind spots in both the literature and practice. On the basis of case studies from different world regions, including Austria, Australia, Colombia, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain, Turkey, the UK and the USA, investigated from various disciplinary perspectives, the contributions develop the field of ombud research further. Its contents and accessible style make the book relevant for anyone interested in ombud and oversight institutions: academics, researchers, students, and practitioners alike.

Empirical and Critical Perspectives

New Directions in Ombud Research

The Rule of Law in Context

Power of Rulers, Power of Rules: Russia’s Legal Dualism in Action

The Rule of Law in Russia

"Die Verordnung über künstliche Intelligenz (KI-VO)" stellt harmonisierte Regeln für die Entwicklung, das Inverkehrbringen und die Nutzung von KI-Systemen in der EU auf. Die Vorgaben dienen auch dem Schutz der Sicherheit und der Wahrung der Grundrechte der Unionsbürgerinnen und Unionsbürger. Der Rechtsakt bringt erhebliche rechtliche sowie wirtschaftliche Auswirkungen auf Unternehmensaktivitäten mit sich und legt insb. Anforderungen für Anbieter und Betreiber von KI-Systemen fest. 

Der NomosKommentar zur KI-VO erläutert die neuen Vorgaben verständlich und anwendungsbezogen. Das Werk analysiert die Vorgaben der KI-VO strukturiert und klärt unter anderem,
<li>welche Pflichten Anbietern und Betreibern von KI-Systemen auferlegt werden,
</li><li>wie KI-Systeme rechtskonform eingeführt und angewendet werden können,
</li><li>wie das neue Aufsichtssystem ausgestaltet ist und welche Sanktionen bei Verstößen drohen.

Besondere Vorzüge
</li><li>Praxisnahe und zugleich wissenschaftlich fundierte Kommentierung der KI-VO unter Einbeziehung delegierter Rechtsakte, der Leitlinien der EU-Kommission und der Verwaltungspraxis des AI Office 
</li><li>Systematische Darstellung des Rechts der Künstlichen Intelligenz in ausgewählten Ländern außerhalb der EU (insb. China, den USA und der Schweiz)
</li><li>Weitere spezielle Kapitel, u.a. zu technischen, ethischen und philosophischen Grundlagen, zu den mit der KI-VO verknüpften Standards, zu parallelen Regelwerken, zur Verantwortung für KI - auch unter Berücksichtigung der aktualisierten Produkthaftungsrichtlinie - und zu datenschutzrechtlichen Aspekten

Zielgruppen
Unternehmensjurist:innen, Unternehmen, Rechtsanwaltschaft, Marktüberwachungsbehörden, Aufsichtsbehörden, Wirtschafts- und Verbraucherverbände, Forschungseinrichtungen, Nichtregierungsorganisationen, Europäische Institutionen.

Herausgeber:in
Herausgegeben wird das Werk von Prof. Dr. Janine Wendt, Leiterin des Fachgebietes für Bürgerliches Recht und Unternehmensrecht an der Technischen Universität Darmstadt, und Prof. Dr. Domenik H. Wendt, LL.M., der die Professur für Bürgerliches Recht, Europäisches Wirtschaftsrecht und Europarecht an der Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences inne hat.

Die Autor:innen sind erfahrene Expert:innen aus der Wissenschaft:
Assistant Prof. Gilad Abiri, J.S.D., LL.M. (Yale), LL.M. (Tel Aviv) ¿ Prof. Dr. Dr. Walter Blocher ¿ Prof. Dr. Johannes Buchheim, LL.M. (Yale ¿ Martina Block, LL.M. ¿ Dr. Sophie Burchardi, LL.M. (King's College London) ¿ Prof. Dr. Thomas Burri ¿ Philipp Dilger ¿Prof. Dr. Jan Eichelberger, LL.M.oec. | Dr. Daniel Feulner ¿ Dr. Sebastian Hallensleben | Prof. Dr. Simon Johannes Heetkamp, LL.M. | Prof. Dr. Dr. Rafaela Hillerbrand ¿ Prof. Dr. Andreas Kerkemeyer | Prof. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, LL.M. (Harvard) ¿ Prof. Dr. Christoph Kumpan, LL.M. (Univ. of Chicago) ¿ Phillip Mahlow | Prof. Dr. Florian Möslein, Dipl.-Kfm., LL.M. (London) ¿ Prof. Dr. Paulina Jo Pesch | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Steven Peters ¿ Prof. Martin Petrin, S.J.D., Ph. D., LL.M. (Columbia) ¿ Dr. Jonas Pfister ¿ Prof. Dr. Lena Rudkowski ¿ Dr. Michael Schmidt ¿ Dr. Annika Selzer ¿ Dr. Axel Spies ¿ Prof. Dr. Oskar von Stryk ¿ Sarah Stummer, LL.M. | Dr. Constantin Teetzmann | Prof. Dr. Alexander Tischbirek ¿ Prof. Dr. Nils Urbach ¿ Prof. Dr. Janine Wendt ¿ Prof. Dr. Domenik H. Wendt, LL.M.
</li>

Kommentar

Verordnung über künstliche Intelligenz: KI-VO

This landmark collection provides new insights, concepts and techniques to understand and respond to tort claims based on illegal conduct. It is the first comparative study of this difficult field, which has remained contested despite numerous decisions of the highest courts in the common law world. The collection draws on scholars from common law and civilian jurisdictions spanning Argentina, Australia, Brazil, England and Wales, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Scotland, Singapore, Spain, South Africa and Sweden. Together they set out fact patterns, and justifications for tort liability to illustrate the coherence and unity that exists when courts address such claims. While common law legal systems have developed a specific defence of illegality for some of those fact patterns, civilian jurisdictions tend to see illegality operating, if at all, through the existing components of tort liability. The book explains how these different approaches have been reached, how they work, and what they reveal about reasoning in tort.

Comparative Legal Reasoning in Global Perspective

Understanding Tort Claims and Illegality

Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) is a conservation approach designed to ensure that any development or land-use change results in a measurable increase in biodiversity compared to the baseline conditions prior to the project. This concept transcends the traditional mitigation of environmental impacts, emphasising the enhancement and restoration of ecosystems and biodiversity. Biodiversity Net Gain Law and Practice provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal frameworks and policies that govern the protection and enhancement of biodiversity. This book explores the intersection of environmental, planning, and development laws and highlight how these regulations work together to ensure sustainable development and conservation efforts. It looks at key legislation such as the Planning Act 2008, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, and the National Planning Policy Framework. Through case studies, legal analysis, and policy discussions, this book illustrates the practical applications and challenges of implementing biodiversity laws, and compares their success in the UK, Europe, India, Australia, Japan and South Africa. This title is included in Bloomsbury Professional's Environmental Law online service.

Biodiversity Net Gain Law and Practice

Privacy, Government Surveillance, and Business Intelligence. A Comparative Legal Study of the Netherlands and Belgium

Autres titres sur ce thème