<div class="raw-html-embed"> Connaissez-vous déjà notre service clients professionnels ? <a href="/fr/pour-les-clients-professionels">Nous nous ferons un plaisir de vous conseiller</a>.</div>

NL_Doormat: Hintergrundfarbe des Newsletter Banners unten in der Doormat. Mit # eingeben z.B. #1405BE

NL_Doormat: Verlinkung zur Newsletter Seite

Über uns

À propos de nous

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Karriere

Carrière

Impressum

Mentions légales

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Datenbanken

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Autorenstimmen

Témoignages

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Partner

Partenaires

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Sortiment und Funktionen

Assortiment et recherche

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Šadl U: Good Judgment

Good Judgment

The European Court of Justice as a Context-Conscious Lawmaker

1. Introduction a. The Main Claim b. The Structure i. The Premise ii. Contribution c. The Outline d. In Sum Part One: The Analytical Framework 2. Context Conscious Judging a. Four Perspectives on Context Conscious Judging i. Maximising Legal Values with Sound Legal Arguments ii. Maximising Power with Strategic Solutions iii. Maintaining Authority iv. Minimising Conflict by Muddling Through b. The Court's Context Conscious Reasoning and Political Power 3. Good Judgement a. From Context Conscious Judging to Good Judgment i. The Baseline: Model Application of Law and the Structure of Typical Justification ii. Non-binary Decisions: An Illustration iii. Conflicting Interests iv. Distinctions b. Three Types of Good Judgment c. Conclusion 4. Operationalising Good Judgment a. Three Steps of the Analysis b. The Parameters of Case Law i. Legal Characteristics ii. Case Characteristics c. Annotation of Judgments Conclusion to Part One Part Two: The Mechanics of Good Judgment 5. Persons a. Introduction b. The Rules Governing the Free Movement of Persons and European Citizens i. Treaty Rights, Legislative Acts, and the Competence to Regulate Free Movement ii. Citizenship Rights Directive: Consolidating Legislative Instruments, Case Law and Conflict c. Free Movement Disputes: Legal Issues d. The Parameters of Good Judgement i. Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies through the Prism of Proportionality, Discrimination and Compatibility Review ii. Individual Protection and Deferral of Authority in Judgments Upholding European Rights and Principles iii. Preserving State Autonomy in Judgments Advancing Free Movement of Persons Law iv. Relevant Information About Free Movement of Persons Cases e. Emblematic Judgments: Facts, Justification, Context, Implications i. Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies ii. Deferential Upholding of European Rights iii. Bounded Undesirable Interpretation f. Upholding Conflicting Interests - The Long Term 1954 - 2022 6. Goods a. Introduction b. The Legal Framework of Free Movement of Goods i. The Ambiguous Heart of the System ii. Rights at Stake and Interests at Play in the Case-law c. Free Movement Judgments: An Overview of Legal Questions d. The Parameters of Good Judgment i. Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies through the Prism of Proportionality, Discrimination and Compatibility Review ii. Deferral of Authority in Judgments Upholding Free Movement Rights and Principles iii. Preserving State Autonomy in Judgments Advancing Free Movement of Goods: Bounded Undesirable Interpretation iv. Relevant Information about Free Movement of Good Cases e. Emblematic Judgments: A Close Up i. The Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies ii. The Deferential Upholding of Free Movement Rights iii. The Bounded Undesirable Interpretation f. Upholding Conflicting Interests: The Long Term Part Three: The Mechanisms of Good Judgment Introduction i. Main Finding ii. Unpacking the Findings: The Roadmap a. Case Motivated Good Judgment i. The Applicants ii. The Case iii. The Institution (Idiosyncratic Good Judgment) b. Context-Motivated Good Judgment i. Recognising the Stakes ii. Honouring Fragile Consensus/Equilibrium iii. Adjusting to the Climate c. Alternative Tools of Context Conscious Judging i. Reframing Disputes ii. Mixed Signals iii. Low Stakes/Waiting for the Tide to Turn d. Appraisal 8. Conclusion a. Summary of the Argument b. Contribution c. Is Good Judgment a Good Idea?

Analyses in full the matters relating to the regulation of international trade under UK legislation, including coverage of geo-political situations such as the war in the Ukraine.

The UK Regulation of International Trade

This book examines intermediate appellate courts by using the Irish Court of Appeal as a case study. The operation and contribution of intermediate appellate courts are often overlooked in legal scholarship, which tends to focus on apex courts, most frequently national supreme courts. However, intermediate appellate courts perform a series of vital functions, including error prevention, the development of doctrine, and ensuring that apex courts are free to concentrate on issues of exceptional public importance. The significance of intermediate appellate courts has increased in recent decades in tandem with an increase in the volume and complexity of litigation in many countries. The Irish Court of Appeal was established in 2014 and this enables a number of dimensions of non-apex courts to be examined, including the rationales for, and challenges of, inserting such a court into an existing and well-established legal system. Institutional aspects of the court such as the appointment and promotion of its judges and its rules on dissent are analysed. The process of 'setting up court' is described. In addition, its contribution to some areas of substantive law over the first 10 years of its operation is evaluated. Interviews with judges who have served on the Court enrich the book's account of its operation and development. In addition, comparative perspectives from Northern Ireland and England and Wales enhance the analysis of an integral part of many legal systems.

The First Decade of an Intermediate Appellate Court

The Irish Court of Appeal

Key Ideas in Law

This book explores several key ideas relating to the 'principle of legality'. In the United Kingdom, the 'principle of legality' is an interpretive tool applied by courts to legislation that is deemed to be unclear. The term is used as shorthand for the idea that Parliament may only override fundamental legal or constitutional norms using clear legislation. This deceptively simple notion has a rich and complex historical pedigree. Since the end of the twentieth century, a 'breach of the principle of legality' has become a discrete ground of judicial review rooted in the common law. But its status, definition, and reach all remain deeply contested. In recent years, recourse to 'the principle of legality' in public law claims has become increasingly controversial. As the corpus of case law has grown, the application of the 'principle of legality' has been identified by judges, academics, and politicians as both a source of legal uncertainty in its own right, and a vehicle for potential judicial overreach. By building on a rigorous analysis of relevant case law, this book considers the intellectual foundations of 'the principle of legality'. As the analysis unfolds, we will see that there is no singular 'principle of legality' which we can accurately pinpoint. Instead, it makes sense to talk about multiple principles of legality, doing distinct, but related, work. This becomes apparent when we explore the history of the principles of legality in the context of not just public law, but the wider legal system. Moving beyond the historical context, the book explores where and how the principles of legality apply in the contemporary legal system. Subsequent chapters explore the difficulties and uncertainties of determining whether the principles of legality are engaged. Thereafter, attention turns to what norms legality does and does not protect and how courts decide upon this. The final chapter sets the principles of legality in their broader constitutional context. Overall, it will demonstrate that concerns about relating to judicial overreach are overstated. In fact, the reverse is true: the application of the principles of legality do introduce a dimension of legal uncertainty, but ultimately fall short of their constitutional potential.

Key Ideas in Law: The Principle of Legality

This book brings to light a neglected program of cosmopolitan normativity in international law - innate cosmopolitanism. Whilst liberal cosmopolitanism is organized around the abstract individual, and constitutional cosmopolitanism is organized around the achievement of a formal arrangement, innate cosmopolitanism, is organized around a naturally-occurring collective whole: comprising all of humanity at any point in time, and understood as a historical phenomenon capable of exhibiting a will, interests or ends of its own. As such, innate cosmopolitanism is, he argues, is the leitmotif of international law. The book thus brings to light an ill-appreciated stream of cosmopolitan normativity in international law, and subject it to critique.

The immanent collective in international law

Innate Cosmopolitanism

Sports Law

Discourses of Law

Identifying crucial deficiencies in the legal theories of Hart and Dworkin, The Rule of Reason in European Constitutionalism and Citizenship draws on the work of Habermas and Alexy in order to elaborate a new juridical conception of citizenship.

The Rule of Reason in European Constitutionalism and Citizenship

Law, Development and Globalization

Sovereignty, Human Rights and Global Order addresses the question of whether sovereignty is an instrument of, or an impediment to, cosmopolitan visions of global governance. Sam Adelman offers a sustained examination of the contemporary phenomenon of sovereignty, arguing that it is only in overcoming the sovereign capacity to condone unnatural death that the possibility of an alternative, and human rights based, global order lies.

Sovereignty, Human Rights and Global Order

Lloyd's Environment and Energy Law Library

Liability allocation provisions are of vital importance in oil and gas contracts. This comprehensive text addresses the large number of practical challenges stemming from the drafting, interpretation and implementation of such clauses, all in one distinct volume.

The Contractual Allocation of Liabilities in the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry

AI, Big Data, the Environment and the Courts

The Future of Justice

This book traces the evolution of the rule of forfeiture in the UK and other common law countries (Australia/NZ/Canada) alongside the development of the US public policy doctrine.

The Modern Law of Forfeiture

This book offers a broad and systematic introduction to the study of miscarriages of justice by defining them and examining the dimensions, forms, and scale of the problem. The work examines the causes in detail with reference to key cases while also exploring official and unofficial responses. The book's discussion of how specific cases and campaigns have acted as drivers for change in relation to policy, practice and legislation aims to minimize future miscarriages of justice. The final chapters of the book apply a comparative approach, comparing the experiences of England and Wales to those of the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand and France.

Miscarriages of Justice in Contemporary Context

This book is an insightful, thought-provoking study of one of the world's most important courts. There is no doubt that the European Court of Justice has had a transformative effect on EU Law, but not without controversy. 

This book explores these criticisms, asking if concerns over judicial activism, unconventional interpretative methods, conflicts with national courts and over-reach are justified. Drawing on the expertise of leading commentators in their sectors, its ambitious scope explores the question from across the spectrum of EU Law. Its analysis includes the political dimension, giving the fullest understanding of the environment in which the Court and its judgments have operated.

The European Court of Justice and its Critics

Good Judgment

Informations bibliographiques

Sommaire

Mots-clés

Informations bibliographiques

Sommaire

Mots-clés

Autres titres sur ce thème