Über uns

À propos de nous

Nachhaltigkeit

Durabilité

Open Access

Karriere

Carrière

Datenschutz

Protection des données

Impressum

Mentions légales

Zahlung und Lieferung

Paiement et livraison

LEXIA

LEXIA Arbeitsrecht

Was ist LEXIA?

C'est quoi LEXIA ?

LEXIA Familienrecht

Zeitschriften

Revues

recht

Pflegerecht

ZBJV

forumpoenale

ZStrR

Anwaltsrevue

Revue de l'avocat

RSAS

FamPra.ch

ASYL

Life Science Recht

BlAR

Sachbuch

Livres spécialisés

LOKI

Semaphor

Fokusthemen

Focus

Thema

Recht studieren

Arbeitsrecht

Droit du travail

Studium

Études

Familienrecht

Droit de la famille

Sozialversicherungsrecht

Droit des assurances sociales

Strafrecht

Droit pénal

Publikationen

Publications

Literatur

Onlinemodule LEXIA

Modules en ligne LEXIA

Bücher

Livres

Buchreihen

Collections

Datenbanken

recht.ch

Studienliteratur

Littérature pour les études

Services

Dienstleistungen für

Corporate Books

Publishing Lösungen

Aktuelles

Geschäftskunden

Professionnels

Corporate Publishing

Content solutions

Buchhandlungen

Librairies

Veranstaltungen

Événements

Presse

Dozierende

Enseignants

Studierende

Étudiants

Inserierende

Annonceurs

Newsletter

Blog

Autorinnen/Autoren

Auteurs

Unsere Schreibenden

Hilfe

Unsere Autorinnen und Autoren

Liste

Autorenlounge

Espace des auteurs

Bei uns publizieren

Publier chez nous

Autorenstimmen

Témoignages

Verlag

Éditions

Themen

Mehr wissen

Mitarbeitende

Collaborateurs

Geschichte

Histoire

Vision und Mission

Vision et mission

Unser Magazin

Notre magazine

Unternehmenskultur

Culture d'entreprise

Partner

Partenaires

Kontakt

Contact

Shop

Schweizer Recht

Ausländisches Recht

Über unseren Shop

Neuerscheinungen

Nouveautés

Unsere Funktionen

Nos fonctions

Vorankündigungen

À paraître

Nach Rechtsgebiet

Par domaine juridique

Kommentare

Commentaires

Gesamtkatalog

Catalogue complet

Šadl U: Good Judgment

Good Judgment

The European Court of Justice as a Context-Conscious Lawmaker

1. Introduction a. The Main Claim b. The Structure i. The Premise ii. Contribution c. The Outline d. In Sum Part One: The Analytical Framework 2. Context Conscious Judging a. Four Perspectives on Context Conscious Judging i. Maximising Legal Values with Sound Legal Arguments ii. Maximising Power with Strategic Solutions iii. Maintaining Authority iv. Minimising Conflict by Muddling Through b. The Court's Context Conscious Reasoning and Political Power 3. Good Judgement a. From Context Conscious Judging to Good Judgment i. The Baseline: Model Application of Law and the Structure of Typical Justification ii. Non-binary Decisions: An Illustration iii. Conflicting Interests iv. Distinctions b. Three Types of Good Judgment c. Conclusion 4. Operationalising Good Judgment a. Three Steps of the Analysis b. The Parameters of Case Law i. Legal Characteristics ii. Case Characteristics c. Annotation of Judgments Conclusion to Part One Part Two: The Mechanics of Good Judgment 5. Persons a. Introduction b. The Rules Governing the Free Movement of Persons and European Citizens i. Treaty Rights, Legislative Acts, and the Competence to Regulate Free Movement ii. Citizenship Rights Directive: Consolidating Legislative Instruments, Case Law and Conflict c. Free Movement Disputes: Legal Issues d. The Parameters of Good Judgement i. Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies through the Prism of Proportionality, Discrimination and Compatibility Review ii. Individual Protection and Deferral of Authority in Judgments Upholding European Rights and Principles iii. Preserving State Autonomy in Judgments Advancing Free Movement of Persons Law iv. Relevant Information About Free Movement of Persons Cases e. Emblematic Judgments: Facts, Justification, Context, Implications i. Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies ii. Deferential Upholding of European Rights iii. Bounded Undesirable Interpretation f. Upholding Conflicting Interests - The Long Term 1954 - 2022 6. Goods a. Introduction b. The Legal Framework of Free Movement of Goods i. The Ambiguous Heart of the System ii. Rights at Stake and Interests at Play in the Case-law c. Free Movement Judgments: An Overview of Legal Questions d. The Parameters of Good Judgment i. Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies through the Prism of Proportionality, Discrimination and Compatibility Review ii. Deferral of Authority in Judgments Upholding Free Movement Rights and Principles iii. Preserving State Autonomy in Judgments Advancing Free Movement of Goods: Bounded Undesirable Interpretation iv. Relevant Information about Free Movement of Good Cases e. Emblematic Judgments: A Close Up i. The Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies ii. The Deferential Upholding of Free Movement Rights iii. The Bounded Undesirable Interpretation f. Upholding Conflicting Interests: The Long Term Part Three: The Mechanisms of Good Judgment Introduction i. Main Finding ii. Unpacking the Findings: The Roadmap a. Case Motivated Good Judgment i. The Applicants ii. The Case iii. The Institution (Idiosyncratic Good Judgment) b. Context-Motivated Good Judgment i. Recognising the Stakes ii. Honouring Fragile Consensus/Equilibrium iii. Adjusting to the Climate c. Alternative Tools of Context Conscious Judging i. Reframing Disputes ii. Mixed Signals iii. Low Stakes/Waiting for the Tide to Turn d. Appraisal 8. Conclusion a. Summary of the Argument b. Contribution c. Is Good Judgment a Good Idea?

Key Ideas in Law

This book explores several key ideas relating to the 'principle of legality'. In the United Kingdom, the 'principle of legality' is an interpretive tool applied by courts to legislation that is deemed to be unclear. The term is used as shorthand for the idea that Parliament may only override fundamental legal or constitutional norms using clear legislation. This deceptively simple notion has a rich and complex historical pedigree. Since the end of the twentieth century, a 'breach of the principle of legality' has become a discrete ground of judicial review rooted in the common law. But its status, definition, and reach all remain deeply contested. In recent years, recourse to 'the principle of legality' in public law claims has become increasingly controversial. As the corpus of case law has grown, the application of the 'principle of legality' has been identified by judges, academics, and politicians as both a source of legal uncertainty in its own right, and a vehicle for potential judicial overreach. By building on a rigorous analysis of relevant case law, this book considers the intellectual foundations of 'the principle of legality'. As the analysis unfolds, we will see that there is no singular 'principle of legality' which we can accurately pinpoint. Instead, it makes sense to talk about multiple principles of legality, doing distinct, but related, work. This becomes apparent when we explore the history of the principles of legality in the context of not just public law, but the wider legal system. Moving beyond the historical context, the book explores where and how the principles of legality apply in the contemporary legal system. Subsequent chapters explore the difficulties and uncertainties of determining whether the principles of legality are engaged. Thereafter, attention turns to what norms legality does and does not protect and how courts decide upon this. The final chapter sets the principles of legality in their broader constitutional context. Overall, it will demonstrate that concerns about relating to judicial overreach are overstated. In fact, the reverse is true: the application of the principles of legality do introduce a dimension of legal uncertainty, but ultimately fall short of their constitutional potential.

Key Ideas in Law: The Principle of Legality

Modern Studies in European Law

This book offers the first thorough legal analysis of the practice of mixity since the Lisbon Treaty, providing the perspectives of international, EU, and national law. It sets out a detailed theoretical understanding of mixity, the common commercial policy, and the recent case law of the EU Court of Justice. It assesses recent practice and current challenges, such as the non-ratification of mixed agreements, ensuring parliamentary participation in EU treaty-making, the new architecture for concluding EU trade and investment agreements, as well as the new trade agreement between the EU and the UK post-Brexit. In so doing, the author argues that in the field of trade and investment, mixity is no longer a procedural technique to overcome legal uncertainties about competence allocations between the EU and the Member States. Instead, mixity has become a deliberate substantive design choice. This brings a fresh and innovative perspective to a key tenet of EU external relations law.

Moving Beyond Mixity

EU Trade and Investment Treaty-Making Post-Lisbon

The Protection of Traditional Knowledge at the Frontiers of Drug Discovery

Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law

Restoring Balance

National Security and International Economic Law

This book explores several key ideas relating to the 'principle of legality'. In the United Kingdom, the 'principle of legality' is an interpretive tool applied by courts to legislation that is deemed to be unclear. The term is used as shorthand for both the idea that Parliament may only override fundamental legal or constitutional norms using clear legislation. It also encapsulates the idea that courts can 'read down' or narrow the effect of general or ambiguous legislation to protect fundamental common law norms. These deceptively simple notions have a rich and complex historical pedigree. Since the end of the twentieth century, a 'breach of the principle of legality' has become a discrete ground of judicial review rooted in the common law. But its status, definition, and reach all remain deeply contested. In recent years, recourse to 'the principle of legality' in public law claims has become increasingly controversial. As the corpus of case law has grown, the application of the 'principle of legality' has been identified by judges, academics, and politicians as both a source of legal uncertainty in its own right, and a vehicle for potential judicial overreach. By building on a rigorous analysis of relevant case law, this book considers the intellectual foundations of 'the principle of legality'. As the analysis unfolds, we will see that there is no singular 'principle of legality' which we can accurately pinpoint. Instead, it makes sense to talk about multiple principles of legality, doing distinct, but related, work. This becomes apparent when we explore the history of the principles of legality in the context of not just public law, but the wider legal system. Moving beyond the historical context, the book explores where and how the principles of legality apply in the contemporary legal system. Subsequent chapters explore the difficulties and uncertainties of determining whether the principles of legality are engaged. Thereafter, attention turns to what norms legality does and does not protect and how courts decide upon this. The final chapter sets the principles of legality in their broader constitutional context. Overall, it will demonstrate that concerns about relating to judicial overreach are overstated. In fact, the reverse is true: the application of the principles of legality do introduce a dimension of legal uncertainty, but ultimately fall short of their constitutional potential.

On Impunity, Pinochet in England and a Nazi in Patagonia

38 Londres Street

Prosecuting the Powerful: War Crimes and the Battle for Justice

Anthem Studies in Australian Politics, Economics and Society

This book provides the first sustained scholarly and practical analysis of the 2023 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice referendum loss, with a view to informing the future attempts at First Nations structural reform and the practice of Australian democracy.

The Failure of the Voice Referendum and the Future of Australian Democracy

The Case of Germany's Basic Law

Constitutional Effectiveness

Hart Studies in Commercial and Financial Law

Stay ahead of the curve with this essential book, offering a concise, comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of the Prospectus Regulation (including its recent amendment by the EU Listing Act) and the pathbreaking Regulation on European Crowdfunding Service Providers (ECSPR). Placing the discussion in the context of the Capital Markets Union (CMU), this book provides a fresh and insightful perspective on the ever-evolving regulatory landscape of EU primary capital markets, setting out a practical roadmap for achieving effective and inclusive regulation. With a keen focus on the dynamic relationship between legal uniformity and differentiation, the book addresses 2 pivotal questions: how can the imperative of investor protection be balanced with the goal of providing businesses with improved and cost-effective access to EU primary securities markets, and how can the pursuit for greater unification be practically reconciled with the growing demand for regional solutions in a post-Brexit era? Unveiling a unique normative framework, the book provides a holistic perspective; it explores the underlying objectives and intricate complexities of the CMU, critically evaluates the transformative potential of regulatory actions, sheds light on potential inconsistencies, and offers insightful suggestions for future reforms. A must-read for policymakers, scholars, legal practitioners and anyone seeking to comprehend the current and emerging challenges in the regulation of EU primary capital markets.

Good Judgment

Autres titres sur ce thème